![Prediction And Head To Head Elsa Jacquemot Vs. Olivia Gadecki Rnudgdkkj5 Prediction and head to head Elsa Jacquemot vs. Olivia Gadecki](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Elsa-Jacquemot-vs.-Olivia-Gadecki-RNUdgDKKJ5.jpg)
Elsa Jacquemot and Olivia Gadecki will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elsa Jacquemot who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elsa Jacquemot is the pick to win this match.
Elsa Jacquemot -> 1.69
Olivia Gadecki -> 2.12
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elsa Jacquemot vs. Olivia Gadecki
This will be the 3rd time that Elsa Jacquemot and Olivia Gadecki face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Jacquemot and Gadecki (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Jacquemot won 6-2 6-1 in the quarter in the Gaudens back in May 2024.
Elsa Jacquemot
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Elsa Jacquemot](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/2621Elsa-Jacquemot.jpg)
24 - 15win/loss
151
143
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-15 | 2-2 | 10-9 | 7-3 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-35 | 10-8 | 12-12 | 18-13 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-31 | 10-5 | 14-15 | 9-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-25 | 1-3 | 12-12 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, Jacquemot got to the qualifications after defeating Emily Appleton 3-6 6-3 6-4 and Marina Bassols Ribera 7-64 6-4.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Bassols Ribera (7-64 6-4). During the match, Jacquemot scored 76 points vs Bassols Ribera’s 65. The French player was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jacquemot struck 8 aces and she committed only 9 double faults. Elsa Jacquemot lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jacquemot put 49% of her first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (14/35) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Bassols Ribera 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jacquemot started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 52% of the points she played.
Jacquemot has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 54% of her matches (141-122). 5-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jacquemot has an aggregate6-5 win-loss record in the last 7 years on grass.
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W75+H Porto,the W75 Grenoble,the Gaudens and the W100 Ilkley.
The French player has an aggregate 24-15 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Olivia Gadecki
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Olivia Gadecki](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Olivia-Gadecki.jpg)
21 - 18win/loss
177
120
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-18 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 51-29 | 28-13 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 37-18 | 20-7 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 50-22 | 40-17 | 10-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Maria Timofeeva 6-1 6-3 and Harmony Tan 4-6 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Tan, Olivia recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-2). During the match Gadecki scored 86 points vs Tan’s 75. Gadecki was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Gadecki bagged 6 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Olivia Gadecki was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (38/49) of her 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Gadecki broke Tan 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Olivia started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points she played.
Gadecki’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the W100 Surbiton.
The Australian has an aggregate 21-18 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Jacquemot | Gadecki |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
Tot Games | 51 | 44 |
Pts | 152-138 | 149-120 |
Total Points | 290 | 269 |
Winners | 67 | 60 |
%Winners | 44% | 40% |
Both Jacquemot and Gadecki played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Elsa Jacquemot surrendered 1 set, while Olivia Gadecki surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jacquemot and Gadecki have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Jacquemot played 7 games more than Gadecki. Jacquemot scored 67 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 60 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Jacquemot | Gadecki |
---|---|---|
Aces | 17 | 6 |
Avg per match | 8.5 | 3 |
1st in | 81/147 | 77/137 |
%1st in | 55% | 56% |
1st pts | 67/81 | 60/77 |
%1st pts | 83% | 78% |
2nd pts | 30/66 | 30/60 |
%2nd pts | 45% | 50% |
Jacquemot managed to score 17 aces (8.5 per match). Gadecki managed to score 6 aces (3 per match). Jacquemot won 83% points on her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Gadecki won 78% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Jacquemot | Gadecki |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 9 |
Converted | 7/15 | 9/14 |
% Converted | 47% | 64% |
Conceded | 10 | 7 |
Saved | 5 | 4 |
% Saved | 50% | 57% |
Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
The French player broke her opponents 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. The French player lost her serve 5 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Olivia broke her opponents 9 times with a 64% conversion rate. Olivia conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded.
Jacquemot | ||||
Q1 Appleton |
Q2 Bassols |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 23 | 51 | |
pts | 76-73 | 76-65 | 152-138 | |
Total points | 149 | 141 | 290 | |
Winners | 38 | 29 | 67 | |
%Winners | 50% | 38% | 44% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 9 | 8 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 9 | 13 | |
1st in | 47/78 | 34/69 | 81/147 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 49% | 55% | |
1st pts | 38/47 | 29/34 | 67/81 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 85% | 83% | |
2nd pts | 16/31 | 14/35 | 30/66 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 40% | 45% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 4/9 | 7/15 | |
Converted % | 50% | 44% | 47% | |
Conceded | 2 | 8 | 10 | |
Saved | 0/2 | 5/8 | 5 | |
Saved % | 0% | 63% | 32% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Gadecki | ||||
Q1 Timofeeva |
Q2 Tan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 28 | 44 | |
pts | 63-45 | 86-75 | 149-120 | |
Total points | 108 | 161 | 269 | |
Winners | 22 | 38 | 60 | |
%Winners | 35% | 44% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
1st in | 28/57 | 49/80 | 77/137 | |
% 1st in | 49% | 61% | 56% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 38/49 | 60/77 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 14/29 | 16/31 | 30/60 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 52% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 4/7 | 9/14 | |
Converted % | 71% | 57% | 64% | |
Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 1/3 | 4 | |
Saved % | 75% | 33% | 54% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Roman BoychukBoychuk (2-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Isa MammetgulyyevMammetgulyyev (4-6 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matvey KhomentovskiyKhomentovskiy – Marek GengelGengel (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Tadeas ParoulekParoulek (6-4 2-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo (6-4 1-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samm ButlerButler – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Mccartney KesslerKessler (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Elsa JacquemotJacquemot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Dalma GalfiGalfi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Maddison InglisInglis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gergana TopalovaTopalova – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Lea BoskovicBoskovic – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction