Chun Hsin Tseng and Gianluca Mager will face off in the 2nd round of the Milan Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on COURT 10. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chun Hsin Tseng who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chun Hsin Tseng is the pick to win this match.
Chun Hsin Tseng -> 1.57
Gianluca Mager -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chun Hsin Tseng vs. Gianluca Mager
This will be the 2nd time that Chun Hsin Tseng and Gianluca Mager fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Mager (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Mager won 7-6(3) 7-6(5) in the 2nd round in the Yokohama Challenger back in 2019.
Chun Hsin Tseng
29 - 16win/loss
161
83
LWWLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-16 | 7-7 | 22-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-25 | 9-8 | 12-15 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 11-12 | 28-11 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-25 | 9-8 | 30-15 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 7-5 | 4-4 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Chun reached the 2nd round after defeating Carlos Taberner 7-5 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Taberner (7-5 3-6 6-4).During the match, Hsin Tseng scored less points (4) than Taberner. In fact, the world no. 168 won 101 points vs Taberner’s. That means that Hsin Tseng was more focused during the important points. Hsin Tseng was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hsin Tseng bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Chun Hsin Tseng lost the serve 6 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Hsin Tseng put 50% of his first serves in, winning 65% (33/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (21/52) on the 2nd serve. Chun broke Taberner 6 times after converting 38% of his break points (6/16).
Hsin Tseng has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 60% of his matches (218-148). 21-7 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Hsin Tseng has an overall108-65 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Szekesfehervar Challenger where he beat Titouan Droguet in the final 4-1 ret. and the Vicenza Challenger where he defeated Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-3 6-2.
Chun has a compiled 28-15 win-loss record in 2024, 21-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Gianluca Mager
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-16 | 0-0 | 24-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 18-20 | 3-5 | 15-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-28 | 2-5 | 17-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-28 | 4-7 | 22-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 1-4 | 10-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 304, Mager reached the 2nd round after defeating Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 6-1 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Gianluca defeated Pacheco Mendez (6-1 3-6 6-3). During the match Mager scored 78 points vs Pacheco Mendez’s 71. Gianluca was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Mager fired 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Gianluca Mager was very efficient on serve to win 73% (32/44) of his 1st serve and 59% (22/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Gianluca broke Pacheco Mendez 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Punta Del Este Challenger where he beat Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0.
Mager has an overall 24-15 win-loss record in 2024, 24-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2018. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hsin Tseng | Mager |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 25 |
| Pts | 101-105 | 78-71 |
| Total Points | 206 | 149 |
| Winners | 33 | 32 |
| %Winners | 33% | 41% |
Both Hsin Tseng and Mager played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Chun Hsin Tseng conceded 1 set, while Gianluca Mager dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Hsin Tseng and Mager have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Hsin Tseng played 6 games more than Mager. The Chinese scored 33 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Italian made 32 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hsin Tseng | Mager |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 51/103 | 44/81 |
| %1st in | 50% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 33/51 | 32/44 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 21/52 | 22/37 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 59% |
Hsin Tseng fired 2 aces . Mager recorded 6 aces . Hsin Tseng won 65% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Mager won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hsin Tseng | Mager |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 38% | 43% |
| Conceded | 10 | 7 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 40% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 1 |
Chun broke his opponent 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Hsin Tseng surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hsin Tseng | |||
| R1 Taberner |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 101-105 | 101-105 | |
| Total points | 206 | 206 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 51/103 | 51/103 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 33/51 | 33/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/52 | 21/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/16 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/10 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
| Mager | |||
| R1 Pacheco |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 78-71 | 78-71 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 44/81 | 44/81 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 32/44 | 32/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/37 | 22/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWWW
LWLWLLWLLL Tennis Scores in Milan Challenger
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Federico CinaCina (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Yaroslav DeminDemin (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (4-6 6-0 7-63) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-2 3-6 7-68) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-4 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-73 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Andrea PicchionePicchione (6-3 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Giovanni FonioFonio (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-1) – H2H and prediction
