![Prediction And Head To Head Albert Ramos Vinolas Vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri Ta74zs08rg Prediction and head to head Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Albert-Ramos-Vinolas-vs.-Samuel-Vincent-Ruggeri-ta74Zs08Rg.jpg)
Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Milan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Albert Ramos-Vinolas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Albert Ramos-Vinolas is the pick to win this match.
Albert Ramos-Vinolas -> 1.59
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs. Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
There is no head to head record between Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Samuel Vincent Ruggeri since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Albert Ramos-Vinolas](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Albert-Ramos-Vinolas.jpg)
13 - 18win/loss
112
17
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-18 | 0-1 | 13-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-37 | 1-8 | 30-24 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 27-28 | 4-7 | 21-15 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-26 | 5-8 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-14 | 2-3 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 112, Albert reached the 2nd round after defeating Gonzalo Bueno 4-6 6-0 7-63.
In the 1st round against Bueno, The Spaniard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-0 7-63). During the match, Ramos-Vinolas scored 100 points vs Bueno’s 88. Ramos-Vinolas was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ramos-Vinolas scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Albert Ramos-Vinolas lost the serve 5 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Ramos-Vinolas put 67% of his first serves in, winning 64% (41/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The Spaniard broke Bueno 7 times after converting 47% of his break points (7/15).
Ramos-Vinolas has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (283-277). 13-17 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ramos-Vinolas has an aggregate 215-155 match record in the last years on clay.
Ramos-Vinolas’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Murcia Challenger.
Albert has a composed 13-18 win-loss record in 2024, 13-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Milan Challenger
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Samuel Vincent Ruggeri](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/players_nophoto.gif)
37 - 20win/loss
263
258
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 37-20 | 10-5 | 21-12 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 47-29 | 25-11 | 22-14 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 55-28 | 29-10 | 26-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 37-24 | 18-13 | 15-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 263, Vincent reached the 2nd round after beating Michael Vrbensky 6-73 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round against Vrbensky, Vincent recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-4 6-1). During the match Vincent scored 99 points vs Vrbensky’s 77. Vincent was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Vincent fired 15 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Samuel Vincent Ruggeri was exceptionally effective on serve to win 81% (38/47) of his 1st serve and 59% (23/39) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Vrbensky 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Vincent has a composed 37-20 win-loss record in 2024, 21-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ramos-Vinolas | Vincent |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 29 | 30 |
Pts | 100-88 | 99-77 |
Total Points | 188 | 176 |
Winners | 41 | 38 |
%Winners | 41% | 38% |
Both Ramos-Vinolas and Vincent played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Albert Ramos-Vinolas conceded 1 set, while Samuel Vincent Ruggeri surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Ramos-Vinolas and Vincent have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Ramos-Vinolas played 1 game less than Vincent. Albert scored 41 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Samuel made 38 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ramos-Vinolas | Vincent |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 15 |
Avg per match | 1 | 15 |
1st in | 64/95 | 47/86 |
%1st in | 67% | 55% |
1st pts | 41/64 | 38/47 |
%1st pts | 64% | 81% |
2nd pts | 13/31 | 23/39 |
%2nd pts | 42% | 59% |
Ramos-Vinolas made 1 ace . Vincent also made 15 aces . Ramos-Vinolas won 64% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Vincent won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ramos-Vinolas | Vincent |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 4 |
Converted | 7/15 | 4/11 |
% Converted | 47% | 36% |
Conceded | 14 | 3 |
Saved | 9 | 2 |
% Saved | 64% | 67% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Ramos-Vinolas dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Samuel broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Vincent conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Ramos-Vinolas | |||
R1 Bueno |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-0 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 100-88 | 100-88 | |
Total points | 188 | 188 | |
Winners | 41 | 41 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 64/95 | 64/95 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/15 | 7/15 | |
Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
Saved | 9/14 | 9 | |
Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Vincent | |||
R1 Vrbensky |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-73 6-4 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
pts | 99-77 | 99-77 | |
Total points | 176 | 176 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 15 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/86 | 47/86 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 38/47 | 38/47 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 23/39 | 23/39 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Milan Challenger
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Andrea PicchionePicchione (6-3 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Carlos TabernerTaberner (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Rodrigo Pacheco MendezPacheco Mendez (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Federico CinaCina (6-2 7-64) – See score progression
- Vilius GaubasGaubas – Yaroslav DeminDemin (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Elmer MollerMoller – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-64 7-63) – See score progression
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – Gonzalo BuenoBueno (4-6 6-0 7-63) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-2 3-6 7-68) – See score progression
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Ignacio BuseBuse (6-4 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (6-73 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Javier Barranco CosanoBarranco Cosano (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Ivan GakhovGakhov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Giovanni FonioFonio (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-1) – H2H and prediction