Daria Snigur and Katarina Zavatska will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on Court 18. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daria Snigur who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daria Snigur is the pick to win this match.
Daria Snigur -> 1.44
Katarina Zavatska -> 2.71
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daria Snigur vs. Katarina Zavatska
There is no head to head record between Daria Snigur and Katarina Zavatska since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Daria Snigur
26 - 11win/loss
131
105
WLWWLWLLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-11 | 15-4 | 1-1 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 39-25 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 14-8 | 6-5 | 5-2 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 13-12 | 3-2 | 14-9 | 5-3 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 32-17 | 18-9 | 1-2 | 9-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 6-9 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 131, Daria reached the qualifications after defeating Jil Teichmann 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, Snigur had a good straight sets win against Belen Teichmann (7-5 6-0). During the match, Snigur scored 72 points vs Belen Teichmann’s 53. Snigur was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Snigur couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Daria Snigur lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Snigur put 82% of her first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (5/11) on the 2nd serve. Snigur broke Belen Teichmann 5 times after converting 28% of her break points (5/18).
Snigur has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 66% of her matches (196-102). 4-3 on grass in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Snigur has an overall18-13 win-loss record in the last 8 years on grass.
Her best result of the current year was winning the title the W50+H Calvi where she overcame Valentina Ryser in the final 6-3 6-2 and the W50 Lopota where she overcame Kira Pavlova in the final 6-1 6-1.
Snigur has an overall 26-11 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Katarina Zavatska
20 - 19win/loss
200
103
WLWLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-19 | 1-2 | 15-10 | 2-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-22 | 8-9 | 23-10 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-16 | 4-3 | 10-9 | 5-3 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-15 | 3-4 | 8-7 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-15 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 200, Zavatska got to the qualifications after beating Celine Naef 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Katarina had a good straight sets win against Naef (6-2 6-4). During the match Zavatska scored 62 points vs Naef’s 41. The Ukrainian was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Zavatska wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Katarina Zavatska lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Zavatska put 81% of her first serves in, winning 67% (28/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 90% (9/10) on the 2nd serve. The Ukrainian broke Naef 4 times after converting 67% of her break points (4/6).
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W75 Brescia where she defeated Varvara Lepchenko in the final 6-2 6-3.
The Ukrainian has a compiled 20-19 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Snigur | Zavatska |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 72-53 | 62-41 |
| Total Points | 125 | 103 |
| Winners | 34 | 28 |
| %Winners | 47% | 45% |
Both Snigur and Zavatska played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Snigur and Zavatska have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). The Ukrainian scored 34 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Katarina bagged 28 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Snigur | Zavatska |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 50/61 | 42/52 |
| %1st in | 82% | 81% |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 28/42 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 9/10 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 90% |
Snigur didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zavatska also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Snigur won 68% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Zavatska won 67% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 90% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Snigur | Zavatska |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/18 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 28% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Snigur broke her opponent 5 times with a 28% conversion rate. Snigur dropped her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Katarina broke her opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Zavatska conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Snigur | |||
| Q1 Belen Teichmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-53 | 72-53 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/61 | 50/61 | |
| % 1st in | 82% | 82% | |
| 1st pts | 34/50 | 34/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/18 | 5/18 | |
| Converted % | 28% | 28% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Zavatska | |||
| Q1 Naef |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-41 | 62-41 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/52 | 42/52 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/10 | 9/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 90% | 90% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWLLWW
WLWLLWWWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Tomas LiskaLiska (7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Frantisek PechalaPechala (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Jiri JenicekJenicek (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sven LahLah – Roberto RosalesRosales (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Marek PodlesakPodlesak (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marek GengelGengel – Yanik KaelinKaelin (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Antonin StepanekStepanek (7-65 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Zarina DiyasDiyas – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Harmony TanTan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Maddison InglisInglis (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentina RyserRyser – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova – Gergana TopalovaTopalova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tena LukasLukas – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Polona HercogHercog (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
