Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida and Tomas Farjat will play each other in the 2nd round of the Ibague Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CAMPO 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida is the pick to win this match.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida -> 1.23
Tomas Farjat -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs. Tomas Farjat
This will be the 2nd time that Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida and Tomas Farjat fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Pucinelli De Almeida (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they locked horns, Pucinelli De Almeida won 7-5 6-3 in the 1st round in M15 Villa Maria back in 2021.
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 20-25 | 1-3 | 19-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-29 | 1-3 | 27-24 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 72-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-9 | 13-7 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337, matheus got to the 2nd round after beating Samuel Heredia 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Pucinelli De Almeida had a good straight sets win against Heredia (6-3 6-2). During the match, Pucinelli De Almeida scored 58 points vs Heredia’s 39. Matheus was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pucinelli De Almeida fired 3 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Pucinelli De Almeida put 73% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 60% (9/15) on the 2nd serve. Pucinelli De Almeida broke Heredia 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Pucinelli De Almeida has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (181-125). 15-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pucinelli De Almeida has a compiled159-106 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Brazilian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Piracicaba Challenger.
The Brazilian has a composed 15-11 win-loss record in 2024, 15-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ibague Challenger
Matheus has never competed in this tournament before.
Tomas Farjat
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 14-14 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 0-0 | 31-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-20 | 5-3 | 21-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-16 | 22-11 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 571, Tomas reached the 2nd round after defeating Jose Pereira 6-3 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Argentine defeated Pereira (6-3 3-6 6-3). During the match Farjat scored 92 points vs Pereira’s 85. Farjat was quite aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Farjat fired 10 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Tomas Farjat lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Farjat put 52% of his first serves in, winning 83% (40/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (16/45) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Pereira 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Farjat’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Bragado and M25 Trelew.
Farjat has a composed 16-14 win-loss record in 2024, 13-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pucinelli De Almeida | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 27 |
| Pts | 58-39 | 92-85 |
| Total Points | 97 | 177 |
| Winners | 28 | 40 |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% |
Both Pucinelli De Almeida and Farjat played 1 match. At the moment, Tomas Farjat surrendered 1 set while Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida hasn’t lost a set so far. Pucinelli De Almeida has played 1 set(s) less than Farjat (2 vs 3). Therefore, Pucinelli De Almeida played 10 games less than Farjat. Pucinelli De Almeida scored 28 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Farjat scored 40 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pucinelli De Almeida | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 10 |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 48/93 |
| %1st in | 73% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 40/48 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 16/45 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 36% |
Pucinelli De Almeida managed to score 3 aces . Farjat recorded 10 aces . Pucinelli De Almeida won 70% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Farjat won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 36% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pucinelli De Almeida | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 50% | 57% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Matheus broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Pucinelli De Almeida conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Farjat broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Farjat conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 57% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pucinelli De Almeida | |||
| R1 Heredia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-39 | 58-39 | |
| Total points | 97 | 97 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/55 | 40/55 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 9/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Farjat | |||
| R1 Pereira |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 92-85 | 92-85 | |
| Total points | 177 | 177 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 48/93 | 48/93 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 40/48 | 40/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/45 | 16/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWLWWL
LWWLLLWWWW Tennis Scores in Ibague Challenger
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Noah SchachterSchachter – Dali BlanchBlanch (6-73 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez (3-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-64 7-64) – See score progression
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Juan Sebastian OsorioSebastian Osorio (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Facundo MenaMena – Garrett JohnsJohns (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Daniel Antonio NunezAntonio Nunez (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Finn Reynolds/Matias SotoReynolds/Matias Soto – Garrett Johns/Pranav KumarJohns/Pranav Kumar (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Hady HabibHabib – Alexander StaterStater (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Valerio AboianAboian – Juan Alejandro HernandezAlejandro Hernandez (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Johan Alexander RodriguezAlexander Rodriguez (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo – Diego Barreto SanchezBarreto Sanchez (6-2 1-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-1 0-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas FarjatFarjat – Jose PereiraPereira (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Samuel HerediaHeredia (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Roberto CidCid (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Noah SchachterSchachter – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – Matias SotoSoto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Tomas FarjatFarjat (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
