Natalija Stevanovic and Maddison Inglis will fight against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on Court 14. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Natalija Stevanovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Natalija Stevanovic is the pick to win this match.
Natalija Stevanovic -> 1.85
Maddison Inglis -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Natalija Stevanovic vs. Maddison Inglis
This will be the 4th time that Natalija Stevanovic and Maddison Inglis face off. The head to head is 3-0 for Inglis (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Inglis won 7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 in the qualifications in at the Wimbledon back in 2022.
Natalija Stevanovic
10 - 17win/loss
338
145
LWWLLLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-27 | 4-13 | 6-6 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 6-2 |
| 2023 | 26-27 | 8-12 | 8-6 | 2-4 | 8-4 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-25 | 19-10 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-25 | 9-8 | 3-9 | 5-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 195, the Serbian reached the qualifications after defeating Taylah Preston 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Natalija had a good straight sets win against Preston (6-3 7-5). During the match, Kostic scored 80 points vs Preston’s 68. Kostic was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kostic struck 4 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Natalija Stevanovic lost the serve 3 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Kostic put 48% of her first serves in, winning 66% (25/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (19/41) on the 2nd serve. Kostic broke Preston 6 times after converting 46% of her break points (6/13).
Kostic has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of her matches (254-200). 1-2 on grass in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Kostic has a composed 21-13 match record in the last years on grass.
Natalija has a composed 10-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Maddison Inglis
22 - 12win/loss
154
112
LWWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-24 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243, Maddison reached the qualifications after defeating Sara Bejlek 6-4 1-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Bejlek, Inglis had a free pass after Bejlek retired on a 6-4 1-0 . scoreline.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W35 Mildura where she defeated Tina Nadine Smith in the final 6-4 6-1 and the W100 Tokyo where she defeated Ena Shibahara in the final 6-4 3-6 6-2.
The Australian has an overall 21-12 win-loss record in 2024, 8-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kostic | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 11 |
| Pts | 80-68 | 40-31 |
| Total Points | 148 | 71 |
| Winners | 25 | 17 |
| %Winners | 31% | 43% |
Both Kostic and Inglis played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Kostic has played 1 set(s) less than Inglis (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Kostic played 10 games more than Inglis. Natalija scored 25 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Maddison fired 17 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kostic | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 2 |
| 1st in | 38/79 | 22/34 |
| %1st in | 48% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 17/22 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 19/41 | 5/12 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 42% |
Kostic fired 4 aces . Inglis struck 2 aces . Kostic won 66% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 77% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kostic | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 46% | 75% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Natalija broke her opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Serbian lost her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Inglis conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Kostic | |||
| Q1 Preston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 80-68 | 80-68 | |
| Total points | 148 | 148 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/79 | 38/79 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/41 | 19/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Inglis | |||
| Q1 Bejlek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 11 | |
| pts | 40-31 | 40-31 | |
| Total points | 71 | 71 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLLL
LWWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Jiri JenicekJenicek (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sven LahLah – Roberto RosalesRosales (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Marek PodlesakPodlesak (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marek GengelGengel – Yanik KaelinKaelin (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Antonin StepanekStepanek (7-65 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Tomas LiskaLiska (7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Frantisek PechalaPechala (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Zarina DiyasDiyas – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Harmony TanTan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Maddison InglisInglis (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentina RyserRyser – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova – Gergana TopalovaTopalova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tena LukasLukas – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Polona HercogHercog (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
