Talia Gibson and Destanee Aiava will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on Court 9. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Talia Gibson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Talia Gibson is the pick to win this match.
Talia Gibson -> 1.59
Destanee Aiava -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Talia Gibson vs. Destanee Aiava
This will be the 4th time that Talia Gibson and Destanee Aiava clash against each other. The head to head is 3-0 for Gibson (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Gibson won 6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 in the quarter in the W25 Perth back in 2023.
Talia Gibson
20 - 15win/loss
125
125
LWLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-24 | 32-15 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-29 | 40-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| 2022 | 50-20 | 48-18 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178, Gibson reached the qualifications after beating Jana Fett 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Gibson had a good straight sets win against Fett (6-3 6-1). During the match, Gibson scored 64 points vs Fett’s 44. Gibson was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gibson bagged 7 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Talia Gibson conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Gibson put 70% of her first serves in, winning 69% (29/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the 2nd serve. Talia was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Fett 4 times.
Gibson has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 63% of her matches (113-67). 3-2 on grass in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Gibson has a composed4-6 win-loss record in the last 5 years on grass.
Gibson’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the W75 Maribor and the Novo.
The Australian has a compiled 19-15 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Talia has never competed in this tournament before.
Destanee Aiava
22 - 17win/loss
198
147
WWWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-26 | 38-19 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-24 | 41-19 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-13 | 27-11 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-11 | 2-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-6 | 13-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 193, Aiava reached the qualifications after defeating Anastasiya Soboleva 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Aiava had a good straight sets win against Soboleva (6-3 6-3). During the match Aiava scored 67 points vs Soboleva’s 55. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Aiava scored 2 aces and she was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Destanee Aiava lost the serve once and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Aiava put 60% of her first serves in, winning 81% (30/37) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Destanee broke Soboleva 4 times after converting 57% of her break points (4/7).
The Australian’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the W35 Osaka.
Destanee has an overall 22-16 win-loss record in 2024, 5-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gibson | Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 18 |
| Pts | 64-44 | 67-55 |
| Total Points | 108 | 122 |
| Winners | 29 | 30 |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% |
Both Gibson and Aiava played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gibson and Aiava have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gibson played 2 games less than Aiava. Talia scored 29 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian struck 30 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gibson | Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 2 |
| 1st in | 42/60 | 37/62 |
| %1st in | 70% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 30/37 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/25 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 40% |
Gibson managed to score 7 aces . Aiava recorded 2 aces . Gibson won 69% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Aiava won 81% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gibson | Aiava |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 100% | 57% |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Talia broke her opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Australian pretty effective on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points. Aiava broke her opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Destanee conceded her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gibson | |||
| Q1 Fett |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-44 | 64-44 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/60 | 42/60 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 29/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Aiava | |||
| Q1 Soboleva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-55 | 67-55 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/62 | 37/62 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWW
WWWWWLWLWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Jiri JenicekJenicek (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sven LahLah – Roberto RosalesRosales (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Marek PodlesakPodlesak (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marek GengelGengel – Yanik KaelinKaelin (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Antonin StepanekStepanek (7-65 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Tomas LiskaLiska (7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Frantisek PechalaPechala (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Zarina DiyasDiyas – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Harmony TanTan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – Maddison InglisInglis (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentina RyserRyser – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova – Gergana TopalovaTopalova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tena LukasLukas – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Polona HercogHercog (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
