Billy Harris and Charles Broom will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 5th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Billy Harris who should win in 3 sets.
Billy Harris -> 1.46
Charles Broom -> 2.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Billy Harris vs. Charles Broom
This will be the 5th time that Billy Harris and Charles Broom face off. The head to head is 3-1 for Harris (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Broom won 6-4 6-4
in the semifinal in the Nottingham 2 Challenger back in June 2024.Billy Harris
23 - 20win/loss
139
139
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-20 | 3-3 | 6-8 | 5-6 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-34 | 27-15 | 7-8 | 14-5 | 11-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-34 | 23-13 | 10-9 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 2-1 |
2021 | 51-20 | 13-5 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 27-13 | 19-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 139 (career-high), Harris reached the 2nd round after beating Jacob Fearnley 6-4 7-67.
In the 1st round, Billy had a good straight sets win against Fearnley (6-4 7-67). During the match, Harris scored 74 points vs Fearnley’s 64. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Harris fired 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Billy Harris was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 85% (40/47) of his 1st serve and 57% (12/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Billy was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Fearnley once.
Harris has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (367-224). 9-3 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Harris has an overall 24-14 match record in the last years on grass.
Billy’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Surbiton Challenger and the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
Billy has an aggregate 23-20 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
30 - 17win/loss
245
235
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-17 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 245, Charles got to the 2nd round after defeating Francisco Comesana 6-4 3-6 7-5.
The Brit’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham and the Nottingham 2 Challenger.
Charles has an overall 30-17 win-loss record in 2024, 8-4 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Harris | Broom |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 23 | 31 |
Pts | 74-64 | 99-96 |
Total Points | 138 | 195 |
Winners | 40 | 39 |
%Winners | 54% | 39% |
Both Harris and Broom played 1 match. At the moment, Charles Broom surrendered 1 set while Billy Harris hasn’t conceded a set so far. Harris has played 1 set(s) less than Broom (2 vs 3). Therefore, Harris played 8 games less than Broom. Billy scored 40 winners (54% of the total points). On the other side, Charles scored 39 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Harris | Broom |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 1 |
Avg per match | 10 | 1 |
1st in | 47/68 | 57/83 |
%1st in | 69% | 69% |
1st pts | 40/47 | 39/57 |
%1st pts | 85% | 68% |
2nd pts | 12/21 | 13/26 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 50% |
Harris bagged 10 aces . Broom struck 1 ace . Harris won 85% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Harris | Broom |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 5 |
Converted | 1/1 | 5/15 |
% Converted | 100% | 33% |
Conceded | 1 | 7 |
Saved | 1 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 43% |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The Brit broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. Harris extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
Harris | |||
R1 Fearnley | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-67 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 74-64 | 74-64 | |
Total points | 138 | 138 | |
Winners | 40 | 40 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 47/68 | 47/68 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 40/47 | 40/47 | |
% 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 12/21 | 12/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Broom | ||||
Q1 Comesana | Q3 McCabe | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | 6-71 7-64 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 38 | 69 | |
pts | 99-96 | – | 99-96 | |
Total points | 195 | 0 | 195 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | ||
%Winners | 39% | 0% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | ||
1st in | 57/83 | / | 57/83 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 0% | 69% | |
1st pts | 39/57 | / | 39/57 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 0% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 13/26 | / | 13/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 0% | 50% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | ||
Converted | 5/15 | / | 5/15 | |
Converted % | 33% | 0% | 33% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | ||
Saved | 3/7 | 0/ | 3 | |
Saved % | 43% | – | 43% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marcelo Arevalo/Mate PavicArevalo/Mate Pavic – Francisco Cerundolo/Tomas Martin EtcheverryCerundolo/Tomas Martin Etcheverry (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Cameron NorrieNorrie (7-69 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-5 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Lloyd Glasspool/Jean-Julien RojerGlasspool/Jean-Julien Rojer – Hugo Nys/Jan ZielinskiNys/Jan Zielinski (7-63 4-6 17-15) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Laslo DjereDjere (6-1 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Cameron NorrieNorrie (7-6(9) 6-3) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Marcos GironGiron (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction