Emil Ruusuvuori and Juncheng Shang will play each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juncheng Shang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juncheng Shang is the pick to win this match.
Juncheng Shang -> 1.909
Emil Ruusuvuori -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emil Ruusuvuori vs. Juncheng Shang
There is no head to head record between Emil Ruusuvuori and Juncheng Shang since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emil Ruusuvuori
14 - 13win/loss
87
37
LWLLWLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-14 | 7-5 | 2-5 | 4-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 13-11 | 6-7 | 9-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 15-12 | 10-9 | 10-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-26 | 21-12 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-15 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 88, the Finn got to the 2nd round after defeating Cameron Norrie 7-69 6-3.
In the 1st round, Ruusuvuori had a good straight sets win against Norrie (7-69 6-3). During the match, Ruusuvuori scored 74 points vs Norrie’s 66. The Finn was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruusuvuori fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Emil Ruusuvuori was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (39/55) of his 1st serve and 89% (16/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Finn broke Norrie once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Ruusuvuori has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (272-169). 1-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ruusuvuori has a composed 12-13 record in the last years on grass.
Ruusuvuori’s best result of the year was reaching the final in Hong Kong.
The Finn has an overall 14-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Juncheng Shang
22 - 14win/loss
91
89
WLWWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 104, the Chinese reached the 2nd round after defeating Oscar Otte 6-73 6-2 6-2, Giles Hussey 7-5 7-65 and Tomas Martin Etcheverry 7-5 3-6 7-64.
In the 1st round, Juncheng defeated Etcheverry (7-5 3-6 7-64).During the match Shang scored less points (8) than Etcheverry. In fact, the world no. 88 won 94 points vs Etcheverry’s. That means that Shang was more focused during the important points. Shang was very aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Shang blasted 11 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Juncheng Shang was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (52/73) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Juncheng broke Etcheverry once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Shang’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in Hong Kong and the Bordeaux Challenger.
Shang has an overall 22-14 win-loss record in 2024, 5-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ruusuvuori | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 88 |
| Pts | 74-66 | 271-258 |
| Total Points | 140 | 529 |
| Winners | 39 | 119 |
| %Winners | 53% | 44% |
Ruusuvuori played 1 match while Shang competed in 3 matches. Shang started his run from the qualifications while Ruusuvuori had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Juncheng Shang lost 2 sets while Emil Ruusuvuori hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ruusuvuori has played 6 set(s) less than Shang (2 vs 8). Therefore, Ruusuvuori played 66 games less than Shang. Emil scored 39 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Shang blasted 119 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ruusuvuori | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 22 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7.3 |
| 1st in | 55/73 | 172/253 |
| %1st in | 75% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 119/172 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/18 | 50/81 |
| %2nd pts | 89% | 62% |
Ruusuvuori recorded 5 aces . Shang bagged 22 aces (7.3 per match). Ruusuvuori won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 89% of the points. On the other side, Shang won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ruusuvuori | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 11 |
| Converted | 1/2 | 11/25 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 7 | 15 |
| Saved | 7 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Ruusuvuori broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. Ruusuvuori extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 7 break points. Juncheng broke his opponents 11 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ruusuvuori | |||
| R1 Norrie |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 74-66 | 74-66 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 55/73 | 55/73 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/18 | 16/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 89% | 89% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 7/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Shang | |||||
| Q1 Otte |
Q3 Hussey |
R1 Etcheverry |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 6-2 6-2 | 7-5 7-65 | 7-5 3-6 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 25 | 34 | 88 | |
| pts | 94-79 | 83-77 | 94-102 | 271-258 | |
| Total points | 173 | 160 | 196 | 529 | |
| Winners | 38 | 29 | 52 | 119 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 35% | 55% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 6 | 11 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 53/77 | 46/77 | 73/99 | 172/253 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 60% | 74% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 38/53 | 29/46 | 52/73 | 119/172 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 63% | 71% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 16/31 | 17/26 | 50/81 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 52% | 65% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 1 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/8 | 1/4 | 11/25 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 63% | 25% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 | 3 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 7/11 | 2/3 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 64% | 67% | 131% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLWLLL
WLWWWWLWWL Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marcelo Arevalo/Mate PavicArevalo/Mate Pavic – Francisco Cerundolo/Tomas Martin EtcheverryCerundolo/Tomas Martin Etcheverry (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Cameron NorrieNorrie (7-69 6-3) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-5 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Lloyd Glasspool/Jean-Julien RojerGlasspool/Jean-Julien Rojer – Hugo Nys/Jan ZielinskiNys/Jan Zielinski (7-63 4-6 17-15) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Laslo DjereDjere (6-1 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcos GironGiron – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – James McCabeMcCabe (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Cameron NorrieNorrie (7-6(9) 6-3) – See score progression
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Liam BroadyBroady (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Marcos GironGiron (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander BublikBublik – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Sebastian BaezBaez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
