Dominika Salkova and Elena Gabriela Ruse will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on Court 18. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elena Gabriela Ruse who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elena Gabriela Ruse is the pick to win this match.
Elena Gabriela Ruse -> 1.44
Dominika Salkova -> 2.71
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dominika Salkova vs. Elena Gabriela Ruse
There is no head to head record between Dominika Salkova and Elena Gabriela Ruse since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dominika Salkova
24 - 14win/loss
185
129
WWLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-19 | 2-1 | 12-8 | 19-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-26 | 13-3 | 23-15 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-18 | 6-3 | 22-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-5 | 0-1 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 149, the Czech reached the qualifications after defeating Ann Li 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Li (6-4 6-3). During the match, Salkova scored 66 points vs Li’s 56. Salkova was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Salkova managed to score 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Dominika Salkova lost the serve 3 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Salkova put 56% of her first serves in, winning 66% (25/38) of the points behind her 1st serve and 40% (12/30) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Li 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Salkova has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 64% of her matches (111-63). 1-1 on grass in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Salkova has an overall1-1 match record in the last 4 years on grass.
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W75 Maribor where she beat Talia Gibson in the final 6-2 6-4 and the W75 Prague where she overcame Maja Chwalinska in the final 6-3 6-0.
Dominika has a composed 24-14 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Elena Gabriela Ruse
19 - 11win/loss
128
51
LWLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-18 | 12-5 | 17-8 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-20 | 18-10 | 6-6 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-23 | 13-10 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-16 | 9-5 | 20-8 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-10 | 9-3 | 7-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 152, the Romanian got to the qualifications after beating Emiliana Arango 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Elena had a good straight sets win against Arango (6-2 6-3). During the match Gabriela Ruse scored 70 points vs Arango’s 53. Elena was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Gabriela Ruse fired 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Elena Gabriela Ruse conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Gabriela Ruse put 58% of her first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. The Romanian broke Arango 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
The Romanian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Paris.
Elena has an aggregate 19-11 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2018, 2019 and 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Salkova | Gabriela Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 |
| Pts | 66-56 | 70-53 |
| Total Points | 122 | 123 |
| Winners | 25 | 29 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Salkova and Gabriela Ruse played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Salkova and Gabriela Ruse have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Salkova played 2 games more than Gabriela Ruse. The Czech scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian fired 29 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Salkova | Gabriela Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 4 |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 34/59 |
| %1st in | 56% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 29/34 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 12/30 | 12/25 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 48% |
Salkova recorded 4 aces . Gabriela Ruse recorded 4 aces . Salkova won 66% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Gabriela Ruse won 85% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Salkova | Gabriela Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 83% | 43% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 57% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
Salkova broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Dominika conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 57% of the break points that she conceded. The Romanian broke her opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Romanian was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Salkova | |||
| Q1 Li |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 66-56 | 66-56 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/30 | 12/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/7 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 57% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Gabriela Ruse | |||
| Q1 Arango |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 70-53 | 70-53 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 34/59 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWLWWLW
LWLWWLWWLW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Tomas LiskaLiska (7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Frantisek PechalaPechala (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Jiri JenicekJenicek (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sven LahLah – Roberto RosalesRosales (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Marek PodlesakPodlesak (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marek GengelGengel – Yanik KaelinKaelin (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Antonin StepanekStepanek (7-65 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Francisca JorgeJorge (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Mccartney KesslerKessler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Carol ZhaoZhao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina Capurro TabordaCapurro Taborda – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katy DunneDunne – Tena LukasLukas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova – Polona HercogHercog (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Zarina DiyasDiyas – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Harmony TanTan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
