Olivia Gadecki and Harmony Tan will face off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on Court 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Harmony Tan who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Harmony Tan is the pick to win this match.
Harmony Tan -> 1.88
Olivia Gadecki -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Olivia Gadecki vs. Harmony Tan
This will be the 3rd time that Olivia Gadecki and Harmony Tan play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Gadecki (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Gadecki won 6-4 6-3 in the 2nd round in the Gaudens back in May 2024.
Olivia Gadecki
20 - 18win/loss
177
120
WWWLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-18 | 7-7 | 7-7 | 0-2 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-29 | 28-13 | 11-8 | 3-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-18 | 20-7 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-22 | 40-17 | 10-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 177, Olivia got to the qualifications after beating Maria Timofeeva 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Olivia had a good straight sets win against Timofeeva (6-1 6-3). During the match, Gadecki scored 63 points vs Timofeeva’s 45. The Australian was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gadecki couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the encounter and she committed only 5 double faults. Olivia Gadecki lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gadecki put 49% of her first serves in, winning 79% (22/28) of the points behind her 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Gadecki broke Timofeeva 5 times after converting 71% of her break points (5/7).
Gadecki has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 65% of her matches (165-90). 6-2 on grass in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gadecki has an aggregate18-12 match record in the last 7 years on grass.
Olivia’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W100 Surbiton.
The Australian has a composed 20-18 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Harmony Tan
21 - 13win/loss
189
90
LWLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-14 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 7-3 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-26 | 21-13 | 2-5 | 10-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-32 | 14-15 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-20 | 15-7 | 12-8 | 10-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 7-3 | 3-5 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 189, Tan got to the qualifications after defeating Elvina Kalieva 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Tan had a good straight sets win against Kalieva (6-0 6-1). During the match Tan scored 67 points vs Kalieva’s 40. The French player was pretty aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Talking about serving, Tan made 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Harmony Tan was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (17/23) of her 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Kalieva 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Her best result of the current season was winning the title the W50 Macon where she defeated Audrey Albie in the final 6-2 6-0.
Harmony has a compiled 21-13 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
Previously, her best result was reaching the 4th round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gadecki | Tan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 13 |
| Pts | 63-45 | 67-40 |
| Total Points | 108 | 107 |
| Winners | 22 | 17 |
| %Winners | 35% | 25% |
Both Gadecki and Tan played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Gadecki and Tan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Gadecki played 3 games more than Tan. The Australian scored 22 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Tan scored 17 winners (25%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gadecki | Tan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 28/57 | 23/49 |
| %1st in | 49% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 17/23 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 16/26 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 62% |
Gadecki didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Tan scored 4 aces . Gadecki won 79% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Tan won 74% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gadecki | Tan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 71% | 45% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 75% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke her opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Olivia surrendered her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. Tan broke her opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Tan was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
| Gadecki | |||
| Q1 Timofeeva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 63-45 | 63-45 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 28/57 | 28/57 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 22/28 | 22/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Tan | |||
| Q1 Kalieva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 67-40 | 67-40 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 25% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 23/49 | 23/49 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLLWWWWW
LWLWWWLWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Marek GengelGengel – Yanik KaelinKaelin (3-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Antonin StepanekStepanek (7-65 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Ken OnishiOnishi (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tadeas ParoulekParoulek – Martin KrumichKrumich (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Tomas LiskaLiska (7-67 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Frantisek PechalaPechala (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Jiri JenicekJenicek (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sven LahLah – Roberto RosalesRosales (6-4 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Marek PodlesakPodlesak (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Francisca JorgeJorge (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simona WaltertWaltert – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Leyre Romero GormazRomero Gormaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Mccartney KesslerKessler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Valentini GrammatikopoulouGrammatikopoulou (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elizabeth MandlikMandlik – Despina PapamichailPapamichail (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ipek OzOz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hanna ChangChang – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna BondarBondar – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Carol ZhaoZhao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Natalija KosticKostic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina Capurro TabordaCapurro Taborda – Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katy DunneDunne – Tena LukasLukas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalila JakupovicJakupovic – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktoria KuzmovaKuzmova – Polona HercogHercog (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zarina DiyasDiyas – Sachia VickeryVickery (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sijia WeiWei – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Harmony TanTan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elsa JacquemotJacquemot – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Alycia ParksParks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tamara ZidansekZidansek – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Lea BoskovicBoskovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Chloe PaquetPaquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
