Dali Blanch and Noah Schachter will fight against each other in the 1st round of the Ibague Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 1:00 pm on CAMPO 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Dali Blanch who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Dali Blanch is the pick to win this match.
Dali Blanch -> 1.44
Noah Schachter -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dali Blanch vs. Noah Schachter
There is no head to head record between Dali Blanch and Noah Schachter since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Dali Blanch
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-29 | 9-14 | 14-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-29 | 17-17 | 19-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-28 | 11-17 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-20 | 10-10 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 659, Dali got to the 1st round after defeating Arvid Nordquist 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Blanch had a good straight sets win against Nordquist (6-1 6-4). During the match, Blanch scored 62 points vs Nordquist’s 44. Blanch was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Blanch scored 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Dali Blanch was quite effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Nordquist 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Blanch has a losing record in the last 6 years having won 49% of his matches (86-91). 11-8 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Blanch has an aggregate45-40 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Dali’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Telde and M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
Dali has an overall 13-13 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ibague Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Noah Schachter
15 - 16win/loss
705
692
LWWLWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-33 | 12-12 | 13-15 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-19 | 22-12 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 12-10 | 9-9 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-8 | 9-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 761 (career-high), Noah reached the 1st round after defeating Andres Urrea 3-6 6-0 6-0.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 San Diego.
Noah has an overall 14-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Blanch | Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 |
| Pts | 62-44 | 77-55 |
| Total Points | 106 | 132 |
| Winners | 24 | 16 |
| %Winners | 39% | 21% |
Both Blanch and Schachter played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Noah Schachter lost 1 set while Dali Blanch hasn’t conceded a set so far. Blanch has played 1 set(s) less than Schachter (2 vs 3). Therefore, Blanch played 4 games less than Schachter. The American scored 24 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Schachter managed to score 16 winners (21%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Blanch | Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 24/57 |
| %1st in | 61% | 42% |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 16/24 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 20/33 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 61% |
Blanch struck 8 aces . Schachter scored 3 aces . Blanch won 77% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Schachter won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Blanch | Schachter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 50% | 58% |
| Conceded | 1 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The American lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Schachter broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Noah conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Blanch | |||
| Q3 Nordquist |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-44 | 62-44 | |
| Total points | 106 | 106 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 24/31 | 24/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Schachter | ||||
| Q1 Urrea |
Q3 Barreiros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | 3-6 7-62 7-67 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 35 | 56 | |
| pts | 77-55 | – | 77-55 | |
| Total points | 132 | 0 | 132 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | ||
| %Winners | 21% | 0% | 21% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | ||
| 1st in | 24/57 | / | 24/57 | |
| % 1st in | 42% | 0% | 42% | |
| 1st pts | 16/24 | / | 16/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/33 | / | 20/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 0% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 7 | ||
| Converted | 7/12 | / | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 0% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | ||
| Saved | 0/2 | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWLLLLWLWL
LWWLWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Ibague Challenger
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Samuel HerediaHeredia (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas FarjatFarjat – Jose PereiraPereira (6-3 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo – Diego Barreto SanchezBarreto Sanchez (6-2 1-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-1 0-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Ulises BlanchBlanch (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Sebastian OsorioSebastian Osorio – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Alexander StaterStater (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Garrett JohnsJohns – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Noah SchachterSchachter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Hernandez SerranoHernandez Serrano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateo Barreiros ReyesBarreiros Reyes – Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Tomas FarjatFarjat (1-0) – H2H and prediction
