Juncheng Shang and Giles Hussey will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 3:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juncheng Shang who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juncheng Shang is the pick to win this match.
Juncheng Shang -> 1.21
Giles Hussey -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juncheng Shang vs. Giles Hussey
There is no head to head record between Juncheng Shang and Giles Hussey since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Juncheng Shang
21 - 14win/loss
51
47
LLWWLLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-24 | 25-10 | 8-7 | 2-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 96, the Chinese reached the qualifications after beating Oscar Otte 6-73 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications against Otte, The Chinese recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-73 6-2 6-2). During the match, Shang scored 94 points vs Otte’s 79. Juncheng was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Shang recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Juncheng Shang was pretty efficient on serve to win 72% (38/53) of his 1st serve and 71% (17/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Chinese broke Otte 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Shang has a solid record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (109-66). 3-2 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Shang has a composed11-7 record in the last 4 years on grass.
Shang’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Hong Kong and the Bordeaux Challenger.
Juncheng has a composed 20-14 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Giles Hussey
30 - 14win/loss
411
304
LLWLWLLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-16 | 29-9 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 361, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Arthur Cazaux 3-6 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications against Cazaux, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-1). During the match Hussey scored 95 points vs Cazaux’s 81. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
About the serving games, Hussey bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Giles Hussey lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Hussey put 52% of his first serves in, winning 80% (37/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (21/42) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Cazaux 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Les Franqueses del Valles,M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Monastir.
Giles has a composed 30-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shang | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 24 |
| Pts | 94-79 | 95-81 |
| Total Points | 173 | 176 |
| Winners | 38 | 37 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Shang and Hussey played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Juncheng Shang surrendered 1 set, while Giles Hussey conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Shang and Hussey have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Shang played 5 games more than Hussey. Juncheng scored 38 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit fired 37 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shang | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 53/77 | 46/88 |
| %1st in | 69% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 38/53 | 37/46 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 21/42 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 50% |
Shang managed to score 5 aces . Hussey made 3 aces . Shang won 72% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Hussey won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shang | Hussey |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 38% | 40% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Juncheng broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Juncheng surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Hussey broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Giles conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Shang | |||
| Q1 Otte |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 94-79 | 94-79 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 53/77 | 53/77 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 38/53 | 38/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 17/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Cazaux |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 95-81 | 95-81 | |
| Total points | 176 | 176 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 46/88 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 37/46 | 37/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/42 | 21/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLWLWW
LLWLWLLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marcos GironGiron – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Flavio CobolliCobolli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
