Adam Walton and Daniel Masur will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Mallorca Championships for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 2:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Adam Walton who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Adam Walton is the pick to win this match.
Adam Walton -> 1.77
Daniel Masur -> 1.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Adam Walton vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Adam Walton and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Adam Walton
37 - 19win/loss
107
95
WWLLLLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-19 | 36-14 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 56-30 | 53-26 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-12 | 41-10 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 107, Adam reached the qualifications after beating David Jorda Sanchis 7-63 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Jorda Sanchis (7-63 6-3). During the match, Walton scored 73 points vs Jorda Sanchis’s 59. Walton was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Walton scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Adam Walton was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Walton broke Jorda Sanchis 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Walton has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 67% of his matches (145-70). 1-3 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Walton has an overall1-3 win-loss record in the last 6 years on grass.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Burnie 2 Challenger where he defeated Dane Sweeny in the final 6-2 7-6(4) and the Taipei Challenger where he overcame Illya Marchenko in the final 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
Walton has a compiled 37-19 win-loss record in 2024, 1-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Mallorca
Adam has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Masur
35 - 11win/loss
300
176
LWLLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-12 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 16-4 | 1-2 | 12-1 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 7-8 | 9-7 | 9-5 | 0-1 | 9-3 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4-9 | 5-3 | 4-2 |
| 2021 | 28-26 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 15-12 | 3-2 | 5-1 |
| 2020 | 15-14 | 3-2 | 2-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
Ranked no. 299, Daniel got to the qualifications after beating Hernan Casanova 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Masur had a good straight sets win against Casanova (6-1 6-3). During the match Masur scored 69 points vs Casanova’s 47. The German was very aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Masur made 9 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Masur broke Casanova 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
The German’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Cadolzburg,M25 Nussloch,M25 Trento and the Lugano Challenger.
Masur has an overall 35-11 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Mallorca
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Walton | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 16 |
| Pts | 73-59 | 69-47 |
| Total Points | 132 | 116 |
| Winners | 33 | 27 |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% |
Both Walton and Masur played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Walton and Masur have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Walton played 6 games more than Masur. The Australian scored 33 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel recorded 27 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Walton | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 9 |
| 1st in | 46/68 | 39/62 |
| %1st in | 68% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 27/39 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 43% |
Walton blasted 1 ace . Masur also fired 9 aces . Walton won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Walton | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 43% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 9 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 33% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Adam broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Australian surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Masur broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Daniel conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Walton | |||
| Q1 Jorda Sanchis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-59 | 73-59 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 46/68 | 46/68 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Masur | |||
| Q1 Casanova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 69-47 | 69-47 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 39/62 | 39/62 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLLLWWWW
LWLLWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Taro DanielDaniel (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gael MonfilsMonfils – Dominic ThiemThiem (0-6) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Paul JubbJubb (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jordan ThompsonThompson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (1-8) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Sebastian OfnerOfner (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nuno BorgesBorges – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Daniel MasurMasur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
