Terence Atmane and Radu Albot will face off in the 2nd round of the Ilkley Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 8:30 pm on SHOW COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
Terence Atmane -> 1.82
Radu Albot -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Radu Albot
This will be the 2nd time that Terence Atmane and Radu Albot fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Albot (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Albot won 7-5 6-4 in the qualifications in Delray beach back in February 2024.
Terence Atmane
19 - 17win/loss
131
120
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-19 | 12-8 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 126, Atmane reached the 2nd round after defeating Cristian Garin 7-64. 4-6 6-2
In the 1st round, The French player defeated Garin (7-64 4-6 6-2). During the match, Atmane scored 98 points vs Garin’s 93. Atmane was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane made 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Terence Atmane was extremely efficient on serve to win 73% (43/59) of his 1st serve and 68% (25/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Atmane broke Garin twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Atmane has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (184-108). 1-2 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Atmane has a compiled1-2 record in the last 7 years on grass.
Atmane has an aggregate 19-17 win-loss record in 2024, 1-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ilkley Challenger
Atmane has never competed in this tournament before.
Radu Albot
25 - 17win/loss
144
39
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-18 | 3-3 | 17-11 | 4-3 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-34 | 10-13 | 13-8 | 12-10 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 40-30 | 25-14 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-27 | 4-9 | 2-8 | 13-6 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-18 | 0-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147, Albot reached the 2nd round after beating Beibit Zhukayev 6-74 6-2 7-65.
In the 1st round against Zhukayev, Albot recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-2 7-65). During the match Albot scored 113 points vs Zhukayev’s 103. Albot was quite aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Talking about serving, Albot made 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Radu Albot was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (54/71) of his 1st serve and 58% (23/40) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Radu broke Zhukayev 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Moldovan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Girona Challenger.
Albot has an overall 25-17 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Atmane | Albot |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
Tot Games | 31 | 34 |
Pts | 98-93 | 113-103 |
Total Points | 191 | 216 |
Winners | 43 | 54 |
%Winners | 44% | 48% |
Both Atmane and Albot played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Terence Atmane surrendered 1 set, while Radu Albot dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Atmane and Albot have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Atmane played 3 games less than Albot. Terence scored 43 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Radu fired 54 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Atmane | Albot |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 6 |
Avg per match | 8 | 6 |
1st in | 59/96 | 71/111 |
%1st in | 61% | 64% |
1st pts | 43/59 | 54/71 |
%1st pts | 73% | 76% |
2nd pts | 25/37 | 23/40 |
%2nd pts | 68% | 58% |
Atmane managed to score 8 aces . Albot made 6 aces . Atmane won 73% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Albot won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Atmane | Albot |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 3 |
Converted | 2/4 | 3/6 |
% Converted | 50% | 50% |
Conceded | 5 | 9 |
Saved | 4 | 8 |
% Saved | 80% | 89% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The French player broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Albot broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Albot conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
Atmane | |||
R1 Garin | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-64 4-6 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 98-93 | 98-93 | |
Total points | 191 | 191 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 59/96 | 59/96 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 43/59 | 43/59 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 25/37 | 25/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Albot | |||
R1 Zhukayev | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-74 6-2 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
pts | 113-103 | 113-103 | |
Total points | 216 | 216 | |
Winners | 54 | 54 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 71/111 | 71/111 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 54/71 | 54/71 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 23/40 | 23/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Tennis Scores in Ilkley Challenger
- Arthur FeryFery – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Emilio NavaNava (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-74 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Cristian GarinGarin (7-64 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- David GoffinGoffin – Jurij RodionovRodionov (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Dominic StrickerStricker – Felix GillGill (6-3 6-73 6-1) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Mattia BellucciBellucci (4-6 7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Emilio NavaNava (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (6-4 7-6(2)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Harold MayotMayot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Terence AtmaneAtmane (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Denis KudlaKudla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GastonGaston – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction