Alexander Weis and Blake Mott will square off in the qualifications of the Sassuolo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexander Weis who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexander Weis is the pick to win this match.
Alexander Weis -> 1.35
Blake Mott -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexander Weis vs. Blake Mott
There is no head to head record between Alexander Weis and Blake Mott since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Alexander Weis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-35 | 0-0 | 28-35 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-37 | 0-2 | 51-33 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 58-30 | 2-3 | 55-24 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-31 | 0-0 | 49-30 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 315, Weis reached the qualifications after defeating Gabriele Piraino 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Alexander had a good straight sets win against Piraino (6-2 6-2). During the match, Weis scored 61 points vs Piraino’s 39. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Weis scored just 1 ace and he committed only 2 double faults. Alexander Weis was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (17/22) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Italian broke Piraino 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Weis has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 57% of his matches (311-235). 15-18 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Weis has a compiled297-209 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Weis’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
The Italian has a compiled 15-18 win-loss record in 2024, 15-18 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sassuolo Challenger
Weis has never competed in this tournament before.
Blake Mott
17 - 12win/loss
529
220
LWWWWLWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-25 | 33-20 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-13 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-5 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 360, Blake got to the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 4-6 7-69 6-4.
In the qualifications against Vatutin, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-69 6-4). During the match Mott and Vatutin scored the same amount of points (119). However, the world no. 315 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Mott was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Mott wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Blake Mott lost the serve 7 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mott put 69% of his first serves in, winning 56% (39/70) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Vatutin 7 times after converting 39% of his break points (7/18).
Mott’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Nottingham.
Blake has an overall 17-12 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Weis | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 33 |
| Pts | 61-39 | 119-119 |
| Total Points | 100 | 238 |
| Winners | 17 | 39 |
| %Winners | 28% | 33% |
Both Weis and Mott played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Blake Mott surrendered 1 set while Alexander Weis hasn’t dropped a set so far. Weis has played 1 set(s) less than Mott (2 vs 3). Therefore, Weis played 17 games less than Mott. The Italian scored 17 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian fired 39 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Weis | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 22/45 | 70/101 |
| %1st in | 49% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 39/70 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 13/31 |
| %2nd pts | 74% | 42% |
Weis scored 1 ace . Mott didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Weis won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 74% of the points. On the other side, Mott won 56% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Weis | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 7/18 |
| % Converted | 33% | 39% |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 30% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 7 |
Weis broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Weis pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Blake broke his opponent 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Blake conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 30% of the break points that he conceded.
| Weis | |||
| Q1 Piraino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Mott | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-69 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 119-119 | 119-119 | |
| Total points | 238 | 238 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 70/101 | 70/101 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 39/70 | 39/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 39% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/10 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 30% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLWL
LWWWWLWLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Martin KlizanKlizan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Blake EllisEllis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Elias YmerYmer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Borna CoricCoric (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
