Federico Agustin Gomez and Riccardo Bonadio will square off in the qualifications of the Sassuolo Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Riccardo Bonadio who should win in 3 sets.
Riccardo Bonadio -> 1.64
Federico Agustin Gomez -> 2.17
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Federico Agustin Gomez vs. Riccardo Bonadio
This will be the 2nd time that Federico Agustin Gomez and Riccardo Bonadio play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Bonadio (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Bonadio won 1-6 6-2 6-3 in the quarter in the Augsburg Challenger back in May 2024.
Federico Agustin Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 59-28 | 9-7 | 50-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-30 | 8-10 | 40-19 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-21 | 13-9 | 13-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2021 | 28-10 | 23-5 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 288 (career-high), Agustin Gomez reached the qualifications after defeating Luca Giacomini 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Agustin Gomez had a good straight sets win against Giacomini (6-3 6-3). During the match, Agustin Gomez scored 72 points vs Giacomini’s 56. Federico was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Agustin Gomez bagged 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Agustin Gomez was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine broke Giacomini 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Agustin Gomez has a solid match record in the last 4 years having won 65% of his matches (140-75). 31-14 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Agustin Gomez has an overall89-47 record in the last 4 years on clay.
Federico’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Carnac.
Federico has an overall 31-14 win-loss record in 2024, 31-14 on clay (See FULL STATS)
.Previously in the Sassuolo Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Riccardo Bonadio
13 - 12win/loss
482
164
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-16 | 1-4 | 17-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-35 | 7-6 | 25-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-33 | 2-2 | 42-30 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-33 | 0-0 | 27-32 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 29-15 | 6-3 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 362, Bonadio got to the qualifications after defeating Federico Bondioli 7-62 3-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Riccardo defeated Bondioli (7-62 3-6 6-3). During the match Bonadio scored 98 points vs Bondioli’s 91. Riccardo was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Bonadio scored 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Riccardo Bonadio lost the serve 4 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Bonadio put 54% of his first serves in, winning 71% (39/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (22/47) on the 2nd serve. Bonadio broke Bondioli 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Bonadio’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Augsburg Challenger.
Riccardo has an aggregate 13-12 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agustin Gomez | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
| Pts | 72-56 | 98-91 |
| Total Points | 128 | 189 |
| Winners | 24 | 39 |
| %Winners | 33% | 40% |
Both Agustin Gomez and Bonadio played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Riccardo Bonadio conceded 1 set while Federico Agustin Gomez hasn’t conceded a set so far. Agustin Gomez has played 1 set(s) less than Bonadio (2 vs 3). Therefore, Agustin Gomez played 13 games less than Bonadio. The Argentine scored 24 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Bonadio recorded 39 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agustin Gomez | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 3 |
| 1st in | 30/49 | 55/102 |
| %1st in | 61% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 39/55 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 22/47 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 47% |
Agustin Gomez made 4 aces . Bonadio scored 3 aces . Agustin Gomez won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Bonadio won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agustin Gomez | Bonadio |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | 27% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 15 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Federico broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Federico quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agustin Gomez | |||
| Q1 Giacomini | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-56 | 72-56 | |
| Total points | 128 | 128 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 30/49 | 30/49 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Bonadio | |||
| Q1 Bondioli | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 98-91 | 98-91 | |
| Total points | 189 | 189 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/102 | 55/102 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/47 | 22/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 15 | 15 | |
| Saved | 11/15 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Martin KlizanKlizan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Blake EllisEllis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Tristan BoyerBoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Elias YmerYmer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Borna CoricCoric (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (0-0) – H2H and prediction