Timo Stodder and Matthew Dellavedova will play each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Timo Stodder who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Timo Stodder is the pick to win this match.
Timo Stodder -> 1.46
Matthew Dellavedova -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Stodder vs. Matthew Dellavedova
There is no head to head record between Timo Stodder and Matthew Dellavedova since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 357, the German got to the qualifications after beating Robert Strombachs 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Strombachs (6-3 6-1). During the match, Stodder scored 58 points vs Strombachs’s 37. The German was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stodder scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he committed only 2 double faults. Timo Stodder lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Stodder put 55% of his first serves in, winning 81% (21/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. The German broke Strombachs 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Stodder has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 66% of his matches (193-101). 5-5 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Stodder has an overall157-79 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The German has a compiled 5-7 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Matthew Dellavedova
19 - 20win/loss
412
412
WWLWWLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-21 | 5-10 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-35 | 35-17 | 15-15 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 63-40 | 56-29 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-33 | 18-18 | 14-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422 (career-high), matthew reached the qualifications after defeating Saba Purtseladze 6-77 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Purtseladze, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-77 6-3 6-4). During the match Dellavedova scored 130 points vs Purtseladze’s 117. Dellavedova was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
About the serving games, Dellavedova was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Matthew Dellavedova lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Dellavedova put 70% of his first serves in, winning 61% (42/69) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the 2nd serve. Dellavedova broke Purtseladze 8 times after converting 47% of his break points (8/17).
The Australian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
Dellavedova has an overall 19-20 win-loss record in 2024, 14-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Dellavedova has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stodder | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 32 |
| Pts | 58-37 | 130-117 |
| Total Points | 95 | 247 |
| Winners | 21 | 42 |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% |
Both Stodder and Dellavedova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Matthew Dellavedova conceded 1 set while Timo Stodder hasn’t conceded a set so far. Stodder has played 1 set(s) less than Dellavedova (2 vs 3). Therefore, Stodder played 16 games less than Dellavedova. Stodder scored 21 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Matthew scored 42 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stodder | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 69/98 |
| %1st in | 55% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 42/69 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 61% |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 15/29 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 52% |
Stodder bagged 1 ace . Dellavedova didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Stodder won 81% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Dellavedova won 61% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stodder | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 8 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 8/17 |
| % Converted | 67% | 47% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Timo broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Stodder surrendered his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Dellavedova broke his opponent 8 times with a 47% conversion rate. Dellavedova conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stodder | |||
| Q1 Strombachs |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-37 | 58-37 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 26/47 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Dellavedova | |||
| Q1 Purtseladze |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-77 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 130-117 | 130-117 | |
| Total points | 247 | 247 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 69/98 | 69/98 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 42/69 | 42/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| Converted % | 47% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLLWL
WWLWWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Ivan GakhovGakhov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Gianluca MagerMager (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (1-0) – H2H and prediction
