James McCabe and Daniel Dutra Da Silva will face off in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Dutra Da Silva who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Dutra Da Silva is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva -> 1.36
James McCabe -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James McCabe vs. Daniel Dutra Da Silva
There is no head to head record between James McCabe and Daniel Dutra Da Silva since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
James McCabe
21 - 16win/loss
256
255
LLWWLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 55-35 | 47-28 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 24-14 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 30-19 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-5 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 348, James got to the qualifications after beating Martyn Pawelski 1-6 6-3 7-62.
In the qualifications against Pawelski, The Australian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-3 7-62). During the match, McCabe and Pawelski scored the same amount of points (99). However, the world no. 348 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. McCabe was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, McCabe bagged 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. James McCabe lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, McCabe put 55% of his first serves in, winning 61% (35/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (27/47) on the 2nd serve. The Australian broke Pawelski 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
McCabe has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (106-75). 1-0 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, McCabe has an overall12-14 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Australian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Traralgon and M25 Mildura.
The Australian has a composed 21-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
McCabe has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
30 - 16win/loss
304
207
LWWLLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 52-35 | 7-3 | 45-32 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-28 | 7-1 | 24-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-37 | 1-3 | 24-34 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 46-21 | 2-1 | 44-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 375, Dutra Da Silva reached the qualifications after beating Michael Agwi 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Agwi (7-62 6-4). During the match Dutra Da Silva scored 87 points vs Agwi’s 77. Dutra Da Silva was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Dutra Da Silva blasted 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Daniel Dutra Da Silva lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Dutra Da Silva put 49% of his first serves in, winning 62% (29/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (30/48) on the 2nd serve. The Brazilian broke Agwi 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
The Brazilian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Maceio and the Porto Alegre Challenger.
The Brazilian has an aggregate 30-16 win-loss record in 2024, 28-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | McCabe | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 23 |
| Pts | 99-99 | 87-77 |
| Total Points | 198 | 164 |
| Winners | 35 | 29 |
| %Winners | 35% | 33% |
Both McCabe and Dutra Da Silva played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, James McCabe surrendered 1 set while Daniel Dutra Da Silva hasn’t conceded a set so far. McCabe has played 1 set more than Dutra Da Silva (3 vs 2). Therefore, McCabe played 6 games more than Dutra Da Silva. James scored 35 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel made 29 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | McCabe | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 57/104 | 47/95 |
| %1st in | 55% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 35/57 | 29/47 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 27/47 | 30/48 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 63% |
McCabe struck 6 aces . Dutra Da Silva managed to score 2 aces . McCabe won 61% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Dutra Da Silva won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | McCabe | Dutra Da Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 12 |
| Saved | 5 | 10 |
| % Saved | 56% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. James dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. The Brazilian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brazilian conceded his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| McCabe | |||
| Q1 Pawelski |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-3 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 99-99 | 99-99 | |
| Total points | 198 | 198 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 57/104 | 57/104 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 35/57 | 35/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/47 | 27/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 5/9 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 56% | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Dutra Da Silva | |||
| Q1 Agwi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 87-77 | 87-77 | |
| Total points | 164 | 164 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 47/95 | 47/95 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 29/47 | 29/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 30/48 | 30/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 10/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLWWW
LWWLLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Ivan GakhovGakhov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Gianluca MagerMager (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (1-0) – H2H and prediction
