Hynek Barton and Ji Sung Nam will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hynek Barton who should win in 3 sets.
Hynek Barton -> 1.54
Ji Sung Nam -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Hynek Barton vs. Ji Sung Nam
There is no head to head record between Hynek Barton and Ji Sung Nam since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Hynek Barton
9 - 8win/loss
450
393
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-23 | 9-4 | 21-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2023 | 45-26 | 11-5 | 25-16 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 13-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 490, the Czech got to the qualifications after defeating Stefan Popovic 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Popovic (6-3 6-1). During the match, Barton scored 58 points vs Popovic’s 38. Barton was pretty aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Regarding the service games, Barton recorded 2 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Hynek Barton lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Barton put 57% of his first serves in, winning 62% (16/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the 2nd serve. Barton broke Popovic 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Barton has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 64% of his matches (67-38). 3-2 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Barton has an aggregate41-22 win-loss record in the last 3 years on clay.
Hynek’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Vale do Lobo.
The Czech has an overall 9-8 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Ji Sung Nam
6 - 6win/loss
727
236
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-16 | 12-10 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 663, Ji got to the qualifications after beating Sebastian Fanselow 7-62 6-2.
In the qualifications, Ji had a good straight sets win against Fanselow (7-62 6-2). During the match Sung Nam scored 85 points vs Fanselow’s 71. Ji was quite aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Sung Nam struck 5 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Ji Sung Nam lost the serve twice and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Sung Nam put 47% of his first serves in, winning 76% (29/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (21/43) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Fanselow 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Ji has an aggregate 6-6 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barton | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 21 |
| Pts | 58-38 | 85-71 |
| Total Points | 96 | 156 |
| Winners | 16 | 29 |
| %Winners | 28% | 34% |
Both Barton and Sung Nam played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Barton and Sung Nam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Barton played 5 games less than Sung Nam. Hynek scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Ji made 29 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barton | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 26/46 | 38/81 |
| %1st in | 57% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 16/26 | 29/38 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 21/43 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 49% |
Barton fired 2 aces . Sung Nam made 5 aces . Barton won 62% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barton | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 55% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 11 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 33% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Hynek broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Czech dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. The Korean broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Korean conceded his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barton | |||
| Q1 Popovic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-38 | 58-38 | |
| Total points | 96 | 96 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 26/46 | 26/46 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sung Nam | |||
| Q1 Fanselow | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 85-71 | 85-71 | |
| Total points | 156 | 156 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 38/81 | 38/81 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 29/38 | 29/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 9/11 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 82% | 82% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gastao EliasElias – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mircea-Alexandru JecanJecan – Daniel MichalskiMichalski (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Ivan GakhovGakhov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Gianluca MagerMager (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (1-0) – H2H and prediction