Billy Harris and Charles Broom will face off in the semifinal of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 4th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Billy Harris who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Billy Harris is the pick to win this match.
Billy Harris -> 1.6
Charles Broom -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Billy Harris vs. Charles Broom
This will be the 4th time that Billy Harris and Charles Broom face off. The head to head is 3-0 for Harris (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they competed against each other, Harris won 6-3 7-6(1) in the semifinal in M25 Nottingham back in 2023.
Billy Harris
20 - 19win/loss
139
139
LWWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-21 | 3-3 | 6-8 | 5-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-34 | 27-15 | 7-8 | 14-5 | 11-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-34 | 23-13 | 10-9 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 51-20 | 13-5 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-13 | 19-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, the Brit reached the semifinal after defeating Chak Lam Coleman Wong 6-3 6-4, Joao Fonseca 7-65 3-6 6-4 and Mikhail Kukushkin 6-1 2-1 ret..
In the quarter against Kukushkin, Billy had a free pass after Kukushkin retired on a 6-1 2-1 . scoreline.
Harris has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (364-222). 6-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Harris has a compiled 21-12 record in the last years on grass.
Billy’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Surbiton Challenger.
Billy has an aggregate 20-18 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Billy has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
28 - 15win/loss
245
235
LLWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-18 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283 (career-high), Charles reached the semifinal after beating Harry Wendelken 6-4 6-2, Blake Ellis 6-4 6-4, Shintaro Mochizuki 6-79 6-4 6-2, Lloyd Harris 7-62 2-6 6-4 and Daniel Evans 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter against Evans, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Broom scored 88 points vs Evans’s 77. Charles was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Broom bagged 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Charles Broom was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (38/48) of his 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Evans 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Brit’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
The Brit has an overall 27-14 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Harris | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 13 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 126 |
| Pts | 195-155 | 436-385 |
| Total Points | 350 | 821 |
| Winners | 100 | 194 |
| %Winners | 51% | 44% |
Harris played 3 matches while Broom competed in 5 matches. Broom started his run from the qualifications while Harris had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Billy Harris lost 1 set, while Charles Broom dropped 3 sets. Harris has played 5 set(s) less than Broom (8 vs 13). Therefore, Harris played 65 games less than Broom. Billy scored 100 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 194 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Harris | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 47 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 9.4 |
| 1st in | 119/177 | 256/412 |
| %1st in | 67% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 100/119 | 194/256 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 33/58 | 74/156 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 47% |
Harris struck 18 aces (6 per match). Broom scored 47 aces (9.4 per match). Harris won 84% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Harris | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 19 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 19/43 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 7 | 31 |
| Saved | 5 | 21 |
| % Saved | 71% | 68% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 10 |
The Brit broke his opponents 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Billy conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Broom broke his opponents 19 times with a 44% conversion rate. Broom conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
| Harris | |||||
| R1 Lam Coleman Wong |
R2 Fonseca |
1/4 Kukushkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 7-65 3-6 6-4 | 6-1 2-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 32 | 10 | 61 | |
| pts | 57-42 | 98-92 | 40-21 | 195-155 | |
| Total points | 99 | 190 | 61 | 350 | |
| Winners | 35 | 47 | 18 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 61% | 48% | 45% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 10 | 4 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 42/53 | 58/94 | 19/30 | 119/177 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 62% | 63% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 35/42 | 47/58 | 18/19 | 100/119 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 81% | 95% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 20/36 | 6/11 | 33/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 56% | 55% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 1/3 | 3/7 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 33% | 43% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | – | 56% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Broom | |||||||
| Q1 Wendelken |
Q3 Ellis |
R1 Mochizuki |
R2 Lloyd |
1/4 Evans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-79 6-4 6-2 | 7-62 2-6 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 31 | 31 | 26 | 126 | |
| pts | 70-52 | 66-58 | 111-99 | 101-99 | 88-77 | 436-385 | |
| Total points | 122 | 124 | 210 | 200 | 165 | 821 | |
| Winners | 30 | 32 | 46 | 48 | 38 | 194 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 41% | 48% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 47 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 37/50 | 41/65 | 64/100 | 66/113 | 48/84 | 256/412 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 63% | 64% | 58% | 57% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 32/41 | 46/64 | 48/66 | 38/48 | 194/256 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 78% | 72% | 73% | 79% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/13 | 10/24 | 18/36 | 21/47 | 20/36 | 74/156 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 42% | 50% | 45% | 56% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/4 | 6/12 | 3/8 | 3/9 | 19/43 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 33% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 5 | 31 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 4/5 | 3/6 | 9/13 | 4/5 | 21 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 80% | 50% | 69% | 80% | 110% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWW
LLWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Juncheng ShangShang (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Daniel EvansEvans (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (6-1 2-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-4 7-60) – See score progression
- Harold Mayot/Luke SavilleMayot/Luke Saville – Rithvik Choudary Bollipalli/Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaChoudary Bollipalli/Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Billy HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (3-0) – H2H and prediction
