Frances Tiafoe and Jack Draper will play each other in the quarter of the Boss Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Draper is the pick to win this match.
Jack Draper -> 1.53
Frances Tiafoe -> 2.51
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Frances Tiafoe vs. Jack Draper
This will be the 2nd time that Frances Tiafoe and Jack Draper face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Tiafoe (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Tiafoe won 6-3 7-5 in the 2nd round in Paris back in 2022.
Frances Tiafoe
13 - 13win/loss
28
10
LLWLWLWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-15 | 6-6 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-21 | 21-10 | 8-4 | 4-5 | 7-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-25 | 19-11 | 8-6 | 5-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 42-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 10-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-15 | 7-9 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 28, Tiafoe got to the quarter after defeating Yannick Hanfmann 7-5 7-65.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Hanfmann (7-5 7-65). During the match, Tiafoe scored 94 points vs Hanfmann’s 91. Tiafoe was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tiafoe fired 13 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Frances Tiafoe conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 11 break points. Furthermore, Tiafoe put 61% of his first serves in, winning 79% (48/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (18/39) on the 2nd serve. Francis broke Hanfmann once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Tiafoe has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (334-236). 1-0 on grass in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Tiafoe has an overall 29-19 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Francis’s best result of the year was reaching the final in Houston.
Francis has an aggregate 13-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stuttgart
Jack Draper
15 - 12win/loss
31
31
WWWWWWWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-12 | 9-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 7-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 17-6 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 40, the Brit got to the quarter after defeating Sebastian Ofner 7-64 7-65 and Marcos Giron 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Jack defeated Giron (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match Draper scored 93 points vs Giron’s 84. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper recorded 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Jack Draper lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Draper put 64% of his first serves in, winning 84% (46/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. Jack broke Giron twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Jack’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in Adelaide.
Draper has an overall 15-12 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Stuttgart
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tiafoe | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 54 |
| Pts | 94-91 | 177-162 |
| Total Points | 185 | 339 |
| Winners | 48 | 87 |
| %Winners | 51% | 49% |
Tiafoe played 1 match while Draper competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Jack Draper lost 1 set while Frances Tiafoe hasn’t conceded a set so far. Tiafoe has played 3 set(s) less than Draper (2 vs 5). Therefore, Tiafoe played 29 games less than Draper. Francis scored 48 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Draper managed to score 87 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tiafoe | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 8.5 |
| 1st in | 61/100 | 101/163 |
| %1st in | 61% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 48/61 | 87/101 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 18/39 | 31/62 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 50% |
Tiafoe fired 13 aces . Draper managed to score 17 aces (8.5 per match). Tiafoe won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 86% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tiafoe | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 3 |
| Converted | 1/5 | 3/14 |
| % Converted | 20% | 21% |
| Conceded | 11 | 9 |
| Saved | 11 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Tiafoe broke his opponent once with a 20% conversion rate. Francis pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 11 break points. The Brit broke his opponents 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. Jack conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tiafoe | |||
| R2 Hanfmann |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 94-91 | 94-91 | |
| Total points | 185 | 185 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 61/100 | 61/100 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 48/61 | 48/61 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/39 | 18/39 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 1/5 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 11/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Draper | ||||
| R1 Ofner |
R2 Giron |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-65 | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 28 | 54 | |
| pts | 84-78 | 93-84 | 177-162 | |
| Total points | 162 | 177 | 339 | |
| Winners | 41 | 46 | 87 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 9 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 46/77 | 55/86 | 101/163 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 64% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 41/46 | 46/55 | 87/101 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 84% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 15/31 | 31/62 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 48% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Converted | 1/5 | 2/9 | 3/14 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 22% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 4/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 80% | 155% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLLL
WWWWWWWLLL Tennis Scores in Stuttgart
- Rafael Matos/Marcelo MeloMatos/Marcelo Melo – Yannick Hanfmann/Dominik KoepferHanfmann/Dominik Koepfer (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Constantin Frantzen/Hendrik JebensFrantzen/Hendrik Jebens – Vlad Victor Cornea/Zhizhen ZhangVictor Cornea/Zhizhen Zhang (7-64 4-6 10-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Julian Cash/Robert GallowayCash/Robert Galloway – Benjamin Hassan/Daniel MasurHassan/Daniel Masur (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Jack DraperDraper (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Alexander BublikBublik (0-2) – H2H and prediction
