Liudmila Samsonova and Celine Naef will play each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 2:30 pm on Court 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Liudmila Samsonova who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Liudmila Samsonova is the pick to win this match.
Liudmila Samsonova -> 1.35
Celine Naef -> 3.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Liudmila Samsonova vs. Celine Naef
There is no head to head record between Liudmila Samsonova and Celine Naef since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Liudmila Samsonova
11 - 13win/loss
15
12
WWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-13 | 4-8 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-24 | 25-15 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-17 | 26-10 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-22 | 15-9 | 6-9 | 8-3 | 10-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-12 | 10-6 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 15, Samsonova got to the 2nd round after defeating Alison Van Uytvanck 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Van Uytvanck (6-1 6-3). During the match, Samsonova scored 65 points vs Van Uytvanck’s 46. Samsonova was exceptionally aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Samsonova recorded 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Liudmila Samsonova lost the serve once and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Samsonova put 47% of her first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind her 1st serve and 56% (20/36) on the 2nd serve. Samsonova broke Van Uytvanck 5 times after converting 83% of her break points (5/6).
Samsonova has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 63% of her matches (279-165). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Samsonova has a composed21-11 record in the last 9 years on grass.
Ludmilla’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Abu Dhabi and Strasbourg.
Ludmilla has a compiled 11-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Celine Naef
18 - 15win/loss
171
121
LWLLLLLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-16 | 3-2 | 3-4 | 10-7 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 41-19 | 5-3 | 12-6 | 19-8 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-6 | 7-1 | 2-3 | 14-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 161, the Swiss got to the 2nd round after beating Elizabeth Mandlik 7-64 1-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Celine defeated Mandlik (7-64 1-6 6-4).During the match Naef scored less points (5) than Mandlik. In fact, the world no. 15 won 105 points vs Mandlik’s. That means that Naef was more focused during the important points. Celine was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Naef bagged 6 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Celine Naef lost the serve 4 times and she saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Naef put 62% of her first serves in, winning 67% (46/69) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (19/42) on the 2nd serve. Celine broke Mandlik 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
The Swiss’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the W75 Trnava.
Celine has an overall 18-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Samsonova | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 30 |
| Pts | 65-46 | 105-110 |
| Total Points | 111 | 215 |
| Winners | 21 | 46 |
| %Winners | 32% | 44% |
Both Samsonova and Naef played 1 match. At the moment, Celine Naef conceded 1 set while Liudmila Samsonova hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Samsonova has played 1 set(s) less than Naef (2 vs 3). Therefore, Samsonova played 14 games less than Naef. Ludmilla scored 21 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Naef blasted 46 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Samsonova | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 32/68 | 69/111 |
| %1st in | 47% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 46/69 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 19/42 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 45% |
Samsonova managed to score 2 aces . Naef scored 6 aces . Samsonova won 66% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Naef won 67% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Samsonova | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 3 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 83% | 43% |
| Conceded | 8 | 17 |
| Saved | 7 | 13 |
| % Saved | 88% | 76% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
The Russian broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Samsonova dropped her serve once and she saved 88% of the break points that she conceded. The Swiss broke her opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 76% of the break points that she conceded.
| Samsonova | |||
| R1 Van Uytvanck |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 65-46 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/68 | 32/68 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 21/32 | 21/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/36 | 20/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Naef | |||
| R1 Mandlik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 105-110 | 105-110 | |
| Total points | 215 | 215 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 69/111 | 69/111 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 46/69 | 46/69 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/42 | 19/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 17 | 17 | |
| Saved | 13/17 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 76% | 76% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWLW
LWLLLLLWWW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Donna VekicVekic (6-1 0-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Suzan LamensLamens (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Yue YuanYuan (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Emina BektasBektas – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
