Jule Niemeier and Robin Montgomery will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Libema Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 4:30 pm on Court 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jule Niemeier who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jule Niemeier is the pick to win this match.
Jule Niemeier -> 1.61
Robin Montgomery -> 2.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jule Niemeier vs. Robin Montgomery
There is no head to head record between Jule Niemeier and Robin Montgomery since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jule Niemeier
30 - 17win/loss
88
61
LWLWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-18 | 13-7 | 12-8 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-29 | 3-14 | 5-7 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-22 | 7-7 | 22-8 | 6-3 | 5-3 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 37-18 | 4-4 | 22-7 | 5-4 | 4-2 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 2-2 | 5-6 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 91, Niemeier got to the 2nd round after beating Clara Tauson 6-4 6-73 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jule defeated Tauson (6-4 6-73 6-4). During the match, Niemeier scored 103 points vs Tauson’s 99. Jule was exceptionally aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Niemeier recorded 7 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Jule Niemeier was extremely effective on serve to win 74% (40/54) of her 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve 3 times. Niemeier broke Tauson 5 times after converting 31% of her break points (5/16).
Niemeier has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 61% of her matches (202-131). 2-1 on grass in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Niemeier has a compiled15-9 record in the last 8 years on grass.
The German’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the W100 Irapuato and the W100 Wiesbaden.
Jule has a compiled 30-17 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in ‘s-Hertogenbosch
Niemeier has never competed in this tournament before.
Robin Montgomery
22 - 11win/loss
149
143
LWWWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-12 | 5-3 | 12-7 | 2-1 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 26-22 | 11-11 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-16 | 23-12 | 4-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-9 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-6 | 9-3 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 173, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Annelin Bakker 6-4 3-6 6-2, Lulu Sun 7-64 7-5 and Magda Linette 6-74 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round against Linette, Montgomery recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-3 7-5). During the match Montgomery scored 126 points vs Linette’s 112. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 63 winners.
About the serving games, Montgomery scored 8 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Robin Montgomery was pretty efficient on serve to win 73% (63/86) of her 1st serve and 63% (25/40) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Robin broke Linette twice after converting 29% of her break points (2/7).
Robin’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the W35 Naples.
Montgomery has a composed 22-11 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Niemeier | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 86 |
| Pts | 103-99 | 314-278 |
| Total Points | 202 | 592 |
| Winners | 40 | 147 |
| %Winners | 39% | 47% |
Niemeier played 1 match while Montgomery competed in 3 matches. Montgomery started her run from the qualifications while Niemeier had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Jule Niemeier surrendered 1 set, while Robin Montgomery conceded 2 sets. Niemeier has played 5 set(s) less than Montgomery (3 vs 8). Therefore, Niemeier played 53 games less than Montgomery. Jule scored 40 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 147 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Niemeier | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 20 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6.7 |
| 1st in | 54/100 | 196/291 |
| %1st in | 54% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 147/196 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 57/95 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 60% |
Niemeier blasted 7 aces . Montgomery bagged 20 aces (6.7 per match). Niemeier won 74% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Montgomery won 75% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Niemeier | Montgomery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/16 | 6/28 |
| % Converted | 31% | 21% |
| Conceded | 4 | 21 |
| Saved | 1 | 20 |
| % Saved | 25% | 95% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Jule broke her opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. The German conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded. Robin broke her opponents 6 times with a 21% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve once and she saved 95% of the break points that she conceded.
| Niemeier | |||
| R1 Tauson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-73 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 103-99 | 103-99 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 54/100 | 54/100 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/46 | 24/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Montgomery | |||||
| Q1 Bakker |
Q3 Sun |
R1 Linette |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | 7-64 7-5 | 6-74 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 25 | 34 | 86 | |
| pts | 107-95 | 81-71 | 126-112 | 314-278 | |
| Total points | 202 | 152 | 238 | 592 | |
| Winners | 40 | 44 | 63 | 147 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 54% | 50% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 7 | 8 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 53/84 | 57/81 | 86/126 | 196/291 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 70% | 68% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 40/53 | 44/57 | 63/86 | 147/196 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 77% | 73% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/31 | 15/24 | 25/40 | 57/95 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 63% | 63% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/17 | 1/4 | 2/7 | 6/28 | |
| Converted % | 18% | 25% | 29% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 14 | 21 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 2/2 | 14/14 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 100% | 100% | 280% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
LWWWWLWWLW Tennis Scores in ‘s Hertogenbosch
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Yue YuanYuan (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Greetje MinnenMinnen – Donna VekicVekic (6-1 0-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Suzan LamensLamens (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Aleksandra KrunicKrunic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalma GalfiGalfi – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Emina BektasBektas – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Naomi OsakaOsaka – Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
