Lloyd Harris and Charles Broom will face off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lloyd Harris who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lloyd Harris is the pick to win this match.
Lloyd Harris -> 1.25
Charles Broom -> 3.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lloyd Harris vs. Charles Broom
There is no head to head record between Lloyd Harris and Charles Broom since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Lloyd Harris
24 - 12win/loss
91
31
WWWLWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-13 | 16-3 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 11-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-23 | 21-16 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-14 | 4-6 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-22 | 23-11 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 25-15 | 12-7 | 4-3 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 98, Lloyd reached the 2nd round after defeating Beibit Zhukayev 4-6 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round against Zhukayev, Lloyd recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-64 6-4).During the match, Lloyd scored less points (1) than Zhukayev. In fact, the world no. 98 won 97 points vs Zhukayev’s. That means that Lloyd was more focused during the important points. Harris was quite aggressive to blast 54 winners.
Regarding the service games, Lloyd buried his opponent with 24 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Lloyd Harris lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Lloyd put 77% of his first serves in, winning 70% (54/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 70% (16/23) on the 2nd serve. Lloyd broke Zhukayev twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Lloyd has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 65% of his matches (371-200). 6-0 on grass in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lloyd has a composed 16-15 record in the last years on grass.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Gwangju Challenger where he defeated Bu Yunchaokete in the final 6-2 3-6 6-4 and the Shenzhen 1 Challenger where he beat James Duckworth in the final 6-3 6-3 and the Surbiton Challenger where he overcame Leandro Riedi in the final 7-6(8) 7-5.
Lloyd has an aggregate 24-11 win-loss record in 2024, 6-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Lloyd has never competed in this tournament before.
Charles Broom
26 - 14win/loss
245
235
LLWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-18 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
| 2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 283 (career-high), Broom reached the 2nd round after defeating Harry Wendelken 6-4 6-2, Blake Ellis 6-4 6-4 and Shintaro Mochizuki 6-79 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Mochizuki, The Brit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-79 6-4 6-2). During the match Broom scored 111 points vs Mochizuki’s 99. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Broom managed to score 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Charles Broom lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Broom put 64% of his first serves in, winning 72% (46/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Broom broke Mochizuki 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Broom’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
Broom has an overall 25-14 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lloyd | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 33 | 69 |
| Pts | 97-98 | 247-209 |
| Total Points | 195 | 456 |
| Winners | 54 | 108 |
| %Winners | 56% | 44% |
Lloyd played 1 match while Broom competed in 3 matches. Broom started his run from the qualifications while Lloyd had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Lloyd Harris lost 1 set, while Charles Broom dropped 1 set. Lloyd has played 4 set(s) less than Broom (3 vs 7). Therefore, Lloyd played 36 games less than Broom. The South African scored 54 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Charles struck 108 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lloyd | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 24 | 26 |
| Avg per match | 24 | 8.7 |
| 1st in | 77/100 | 142/215 |
| %1st in | 77% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 54/77 | 108/142 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 33/73 |
| %2nd pts | 70% | 45% |
Lloyd scored 24 aces . Broom recorded 26 aces (8.7 per match). Lloyd won 70% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lloyd | Broom |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 13 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 13/26 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 13 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Harris broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Harris conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 13 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lloyd | |||
| R1 Zhukayev |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 33 | |
| pts | 97-98 | 97-98 | |
| Total points | 195 | 195 | |
| Winners | 54 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 56% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 24 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 77/100 | 77/100 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 54/77 | 54/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/23 | 16/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Broom | |||||
| Q1 Wendelken |
Q3 Ellis |
R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-79 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 20 | 31 | 69 | |
| pts | 70-52 | 66-58 | 111-99 | 247-209 | |
| Total points | 122 | 124 | 210 | 456 | |
| Winners | 30 | 32 | 46 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 48% | 41% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | 10 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/50 | 41/65 | 64/100 | 142/215 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 63% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 32/41 | 46/64 | 108/142 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 78% | 72% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/13 | 10/24 | 18/36 | 33/73 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 42% | 50% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 6 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/4 | 6/12 | 13/26 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 75% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 | 6 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 4/5 | 3/6 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 80% | 50% | 180% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWWLWWW
LLWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Emilio NavaNava – Leandro RiediRiedi (6-76 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Denis KudlaKudla (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-79 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-1 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-612 7-5) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Gabriel DialloDiallo (6-4 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Harold MayotMayot – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
