Diane Parry and Daria Saville will face off in the 2nd round of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daria Saville who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daria Saville is the pick to win this match.
Daria Saville -> 1.9
Diane Parry -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Diane Parry vs. Daria Saville
There is no head to head record between Diane Parry and Daria Saville since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Diane Parry
16 - 13win/loss
53
49
LWWWLWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-14 | 12-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-36 | 6-15 | 35-18 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 11-12 | 7-9 | 1-5 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-23 | 0-0 | 50-20 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-17 | 7-6 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 64, Parry got to the 2nd round after defeating Cristina Bucsa 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Diane had a good straight sets win against Bucsa (6-3 6-2). During the match, Parry scored 54 points vs Bucsa’s 33. The French player was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Parry scored 7 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Diane Parry was very effective on serve to win 83% (24/29) of her 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. The French player broke Bucsa 4 times after converting 80% of her break points (4/5).
Parry has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 57% of her matches (179-136). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Parry has an aggregate7-4 win-loss record in the last 7 years on grass.
The French player has an aggregate 16-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Parry has never competed in this tournament before.
Daria Saville
20 - 16win/loss
85
20
LWWLWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-18 | 11-8 | 8-8 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-13 | 6-8 | 5-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-20 | 20-12 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 84, Gavrilova reached the 2nd round after defeating Clara Burel 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Daria had a good straight sets win against Burel (6-3 6-3). During the match Gavrilova scored 82 points vs Burel’s 63. Gavrilova was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Gavrilova scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 5 double faults. Daria Saville lost the serve 5 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Gavrilova put 68% of her first serves in, winning 54% (26/48) of the points behind her 1st serve and 43% (10/23) on the 2nd serve. Daria broke Burel 8 times after converting 67% of her break points (8/12).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Hobart.
Daria has an overall 20-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Parry | Gavrilova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 54-33 | 82-63 |
| Total Points | 87 | 145 |
| Winners | 24 | 26 |
| %Winners | 44% | 32% |
Both Parry and Gavrilova played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Parry and Gavrilova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Parry played 1 game less than Gavrilova. Diane scored 24 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian blasted 26 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Parry | Gavrilova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 1 |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 48/71 |
| %1st in | 63% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 26/48 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 54% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/23 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 43% |
Parry blasted 7 aces . Gavrilova recorded 1 ace . Parry won 83% points behind her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Gavrilova won 54% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Parry | Gavrilova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 8 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 8/12 |
| % Converted | 80% | 67% |
| Conceded | 2 | 14 |
| Saved | 1 | 9 |
| % Saved | 50% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Diane broke her opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Parry dropped her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponent 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. Daria conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 64% of the break points that she conceded.
| Parry | |||
| R1 Bucsa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 54-33 | 54-33 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 29/46 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 24/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Gavrilova | |||
| R1 Burel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 82-63 | 82-63 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/71 | 48/71 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 26/48 | 26/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 54% | 54% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/23 | 10/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |
| Converted | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 14 | 14 | |
| Saved | 9/14 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 64% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLLWL
LWWLWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Johan Sebastien TatlotSebastien Tatlot (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dustin BrownBrown – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kevin KrawietzKrawietz – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-2 6-75 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Pedro SousaSousa – Jelle SelsSels (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (3-6 6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Zizou BergsBergs (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (7-5 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Francesca JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Tatjana MariaMaria (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
