Daniel Evans and Henry Searle will face off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Evans who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Evans is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Evans -> 1.29
Henry Searle -> 3.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Evans vs. Henry Searle
There is no head to head record between Daniel Evans and Henry Searle since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniel Evans
7 - 15win/loss
60
21
LLWWLWLLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-17 | 3-7 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-27 | 11-15 | 5-7 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-27 | 19-13 | 4-7 | 6-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 27-24 | 12-11 | 6-6 | 3-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 11-6 | 0-3 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 62, Evans got to the 2nd round after defeating Dominic Stricker 6-3 4-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Stricker (6-3 4-6 6-3). During the match, Evans scored 97 points vs Stricker’s 94. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Evans bagged 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Daniel Evans lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Evans put 53% of his first serves in, winning 81% (42/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (19/46) on the 2nd serve. Evans broke Stricker 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Evans has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (298-202). 2-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Evans has an overall 61-27 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Daniel has a compiled 7-15 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Henry Searle
15 - 10win/loss
539
539
LLWLLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-14 | 4-1 | 3-5 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-10 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 630 (career-high), Searle got to the 2nd round after beating Jurij Rodionov 6-2 6-2, Luke Saville 6-4 7-60 and Denis Kudla 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round, Searle had a good straight sets win against Kudla (7-64 6-4). During the match Searle scored 69 points vs Kudla’s 67. Henry was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Searle blasted 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Henry Searle conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Searle put 62% of his first serves in, winning 70% (32/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (19/28) on the 2nd serve. Searle broke Kudla once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Searle’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham.
Henry has a compiled 15-10 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Evans | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 62 |
| Pts | 97-94 | 212-170 |
| Total Points | 191 | 382 |
| Winners | 42 | 86 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Evans played 1 match while Searle competed in 3 matches. Searle started his run from the qualifications while Evans had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Evans dropped 1 set while Henry Searle hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Evans has played 3 set(s) less than Searle (3 vs 6). Therefore, Evans played 34 games less than Searle. The Brit scored 42 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Henry fired 86 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Evans | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 32 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 10.7 |
| 1st in | 52/98 | 110/182 |
| %1st in | 53% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 86/110 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 19/46 | 48/72 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 67% |
Evans recorded 4 aces . Searle scored 32 aces (10.7 per match). Evans won 81% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Searle won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Evans | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 7/15 |
| % Converted | 36% | 47% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Daniel broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Brit dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Henry broke his opponents 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Searle conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Evans | |||
| R1 Stricker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 97-94 | 97-94 | |
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 52/98 | 52/98 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 42/52 | 42/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/46 | 19/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Searle | |||||
| Q1 Rodionov |
Q3 Saville |
R1 Kudla |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 7-60 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 23 | 23 | 62 | |
| pts | 63-39 | 80-64 | 69-67 | 212-170 | |
| Total points | 102 | 144 | 136 | 382 | |
| Winners | 21 | 33 | 32 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 41% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 13 | 12 | 32 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 26/47 | 38/61 | 46/74 | 110/182 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 62% | 62% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 33/38 | 32/46 | 86/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 87% | 70% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 14/23 | 19/28 | 48/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 61% | 68% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 2/7 | 1/2 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 29% | 50% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | 100% | 200% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLLLW
LLWLLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Daniel EvansEvans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Denis KudlaKudla (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-612 7-5) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-79 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Leandro RiediRiedi (6-7(6) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-6(12) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-7(9) 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Denis KudlaKudla (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Harold MayotMayot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
