Paul Jubb and Jacob Fearnley will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:30 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.48
Jacob Fearnley -> 2.53
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Jacob Fearnley
There is no head to head record between Paul Jubb and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Paul Jubb
33 - 14win/loss
201
196
LWWWWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-17 | 20-7 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 298, the Brit reached the 2nd round after defeating Duje Ajdukovic 7-61 6-4.
In the 1st round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Ajdukovic (7-61 6-4). During the match, Jubb scored 83 points vs Ajdukovic’s 68. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jubb struck 3 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (29/41) of his 1st serve and 71% (20/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Paul broke Ajdukovic twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Jubb has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (202-85). 4-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Jubb has an overall13-12 record in the last 8 years on grass.
Jubb’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Paul has a compiled 33-14 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Jacob Fearnley
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8-0 | 7-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 525, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating Clement Chidekh 2-6 6-3 7-64, Mark Lajal 6-2 6-4 and Bu Yunchaokete 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Yunchaokete (6-2 7-5). During the match Fearnley scored 70 points vs Yunchaokete’s 54. Fearnley was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Fearnley bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jacob Fearnley was extremely effective on serve to win 78% (25/32) of his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Fearnley broke Yunchaokete 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Fearnley’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Esch/Alzette.
Jacob has a compiled 11-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 68 |
| Pts | 83-68 | 237-195 |
| Total Points | 151 | 432 |
| Winners | 29 | 95 |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% |
Jubb played 1 match while Fearnley competed in 3 matches. Fearnley started his run from the qualifications while Jubb had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jacob Fearnley surrendered 1 set while Paul Jubb hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Jubb has played 5 set(s) less than Fearnley (2 vs 7). Therefore, Jubb played 45 games less than Fearnley. Paul scored 29 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit scored 95 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 137/200 |
| %1st in | 59% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 95/137 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 20/28 | 35/63 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 56% |
Jubb made 3 aces . Fearnley managed to score 18 aces (6 per match). Jubb won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 12/30 |
| % Converted | 40% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 13 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 75% | 46% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 7 |
The Brit broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Jubb conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Jacob broke his opponents 12 times with a 40% conversion rate. Fearnley conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 46% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Ajdukovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 83-68 | 83-68 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 41/69 | 41/69 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 29/41 | 29/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Fearnley | |||||
| Q1 Chidekh |
Q3 Lajal |
R1 Yunchaokete |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 7-64 | 6-2 6-4 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 18 | 20 | 68 | |
| pts | 98-95 | 69-46 | 70-54 | 237-195 | |
| Total points | 193 | 115 | 124 | 432 | |
| Winners | 45 | 25 | 25 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% | 36% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 70/94 | 35/54 | 32/52 | 137/200 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 65% | 62% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 45/70 | 25/35 | 25/32 | 95/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 71% | 78% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 11/19 | 11/20 | 35/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 58% | 55% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 5/11 | 4/7 | 12/30 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 45% | 57% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | 1 | 13 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 4/6 | 0/1 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 67% | 0% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWLLWL
LWWWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-612 7-5) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-79 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Denis KudlaKudla (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera (6-0 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Arthur FeryFery (4-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Emilio NavaNava – Leandro RiediRiedi (6-7(6) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-6(12) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (4-6 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-7(9) 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Denis KudlaKudla (7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel EvansEvans – Dominic StrickerStricker (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Harold MayotMayot (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
