Laslo Djere and Jesper De Jong will play each other in the 2nd round of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jesper De Jong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jesper De Jong is the pick to win this match.
Jesper De Jong -> 1.87
Laslo Djere -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Laslo Djere vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Laslo Djere and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Laslo Djere
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 1-3 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-28 | 9-9 | 19-12 | 7-4 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 9-8 | 13-11 | 6-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 2-8 | 17-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-12 | 2-5 | 15-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 46, the Serbian reached the 2nd round after defeating Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Serbian had a good straight sets win against Kuzmanov (6-4 7-5). During the match, Djere scored 71 points vs Kuzmanov’s 63. The Serbian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Djere managed to score 2 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Laslo Djere was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 67% (10/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Laslo broke Kuzmanov 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Djere has winning record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (296-236). 6-7 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Djere has a composed 226-123 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Serbian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Prostejov Challenger.
Laslo has an overall 7-10 win-loss record in 2024, 6-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Jesper De Jong
22 - 14win/loss
119
119
LWWWWWWLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 147, De got to the 2nd round after defeating Riccardo Bonadio 7-5 7-5.
In the 1st round, Jesper had a good straight sets win against Bonadio (7-5 7-5). During the match De scored 85 points vs Bonadio’s 76. The Dutch was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, De fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, De put 70% of his first serves in, winning 81% (39/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (8/21) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Bonadio 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Jesper has an overall 22-14 win-loss record in 2024, 15-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Djere | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 24 |
| Pts | 71-63 | 85-76 |
| Total Points | 134 | 161 |
| Winners | 33 | 39 |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% |
Both Djere and De played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Djere and De have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Djere played 2 games less than De. The Serbian scored 33 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch recorded 39 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Djere | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 46/61 | 48/69 |
| %1st in | 75% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 39/48 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 8/21 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 38% |
Djere recorded 2 aces . De managed to score 3 aces . Djere won 72% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, De won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Djere | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 30% |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 50% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Djere broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Djere conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. De broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Djere | |||
| R1 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 71-63 | 71-63 | |
| Total points | 134 | 134 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/61 | 46/61 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 10/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| De | |||
| R1 Bonadio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 85-76 | 85-76 | |
| Total points | 161 | 161 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/69 | 48/69 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 39/48 | 39/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/21 | 8/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 38% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWLL
LWWWWWWLWL Tennis Scores in Perugia Challenger
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gianluca MagerMager (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nerman FaticFatic (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Borna CoricCoric – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (3-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Nick HardtHardt (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Federico CinaCina (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nerman FaticFatic (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gianluca MagerMager (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Francesco PassaroPassaro (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
