Sumit Nagal and Alessandro Giannessi will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Perugia Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.33
Alessandro Giannessi -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Alessandro Giannessi
This will be the 3rd time that Sumit Nagal and Alessandro Giannessi fight against each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Giannessi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Giannessi won 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the 2nd round in the Poznan Challenger back in 2019.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 77 (career-high), Nagal reached the 2nd round after beating Nerman Fatic 7-61 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Fatic (7-61 6-2). During the match, Nagal scored 82 points vs Fatic’s 59. Nagal was very aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nagal was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Overall, Sumit Nagal was pretty efficient on serve to win 76% (35/46) of his 1st serve and 73% (8/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Nagal broke Fatic 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Nagal has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (315-202). 10-5 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagal has an aggregate 219-126 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the current year was conquering the title the Chennai Challenger where he beat Luca Nardi in the final 6-1 6-4 and the Heilbronn Challenger where he defeated Alexander Ritschard in the final 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3.
Sumit has a composed 25-13 win-loss record in 2024, 10-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Alessandro Giannessi
11 - 17win/loss
646
84
LLWLLLLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-25 | 0-5 | 13-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-33 | 3-5 | 33-27 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 20-30 | 2-1 | 18-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-27 | 0-2 | 31-20 | 0-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-14 | 0-1 | 10-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 369, Giannessi reached the 2nd round after defeating Pietro Genovese 6-1 6-1, Alexander Weis 4-6 7-5 6-4 and Egor Gerasimov 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Alessandro had a good straight sets win against Gerasimov (6-4 6-2). During the match Giannessi scored 63 points vs Gerasimov’s 40. The Italian was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Giannessi scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Alessandro Giannessi was extremely efficient on serve to win 91% (21/23) of his 1st serve and 70% (14/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Giannessi broke Gerasimov 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
The Italian has an aggregate 11-17 win-loss record in 2024, 11-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2018 and 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 64 |
| Pts | 82-59 | 221-166 |
| Total Points | 141 | 387 |
| Winners | 35 | 90 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Nagal played 1 match while Giannessi competed in 3 matches. Giannessi started his run from the qualifications while Nagal had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Alessandro Giannessi dropped 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Nagal has played 5 set(s) less than Giannessi (2 vs 7). Therefore, Nagal played 43 games less than Giannessi. Sumit scored 35 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Giannessi recorded 90 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 46/57 | 116/184 |
| %1st in | 81% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 90/116 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 41/68 |
| %2nd pts | 73% | 60% |
Nagal didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Giannessi made 6 aces (2 per match). Nagal won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 73% of the points. On the other side, Giannessi won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Giannessi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 12 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 12/26 |
| % Converted | 33% | 46% |
| Conceded | 1 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 8 |
| % Saved | 0% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Sumit broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Sumit lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Italian broke his opponents 12 times with a 46% conversion rate. Alessandro conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Fatic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 82-59 | 82-59 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/57 | 46/57 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 81% | |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 35/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/11 | 8/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 73% | 73% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Giannessi | |||||
| Q1 Genovese |
Q3 Weis |
R1 Gerasimov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 32 | 18 | 64 | |
| pts | 56-24 | 102-102 | 63-40 | 221-166 | |
| Total points | 80 | 204 | 103 | 387 | |
| Winners | 15 | 54 | 21 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 53% | 33% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 19/33 | 74/108 | 23/43 | 116/184 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 69% | 53% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 15/19 | 54/74 | 21/23 | 90/116 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 73% | 91% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/14 | 14/34 | 14/20 | 41/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 93% | 41% | 70% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 3/8 | 4/10 | 12/26 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 38% | 40% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 10 | 1 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 8/10 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 80% | 0% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLLLL
LLWLLLLWLL Tennis Scores in Perugia Challenger
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nerman FaticFatic (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gianluca MagerMager (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Borna CoricCoric – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (3-6 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Francesco PassaroPassaro – Nick HardtHardt (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Laslo DjereDjere – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Luciano DarderiDarderi – Federico CinaCina (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Giovanni OradiniOradini (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nerman FaticFatic (7-6(1) 6-2) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Gianluca MagerMager (7-6(5) 7-5) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Francesco PassaroPassaro (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle – Fabio FogniniFognini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Laslo DjereDjere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
