Toby Alex Kodat and Jerome Kym will square off in the qualifications of the Bratislava 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on Court 9. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jerome Kym who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jerome Kym is the pick to win this match.
Jerome Kym -> 1.57
Toby Alex Kodat -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Toby Alex Kodat vs. Jerome Kym
This will be the 2nd time that Toby Alex Kodat and Jerome Kym face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Alex Kodat (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Alex Kodat won 6-3 7-5 in the quarter in M25 Klosters back in 2023.
Toby Alex Kodat
20 - 19win/loss
319
308
LLWLWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-20 | 4-4 | 16-13 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 39-23 | 4-5 | 28-14 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-11 | 3-3 | 6-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 5-6 | 19-15 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-15 | 3-5 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 320, the American got to the qualifications after beating Cem Ilkel 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Alex Kodat had a good straight sets win against Ilkel (6-2 6-4). During the match, Alex Kodat scored 69 points vs Ilkel’s 55. Toby was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Alex Kodat fired 4 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Toby Alex Kodat was pretty effective on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Ilkel 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Alex Kodat has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 53% of his matches (116-102). 16-11 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Alex Kodat has an overall78-60 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Toby’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Wesley Chapel and the Prague Challenger.
The American has a compiled 20-18 win-loss record in 2024, 16-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Jerome Kym
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 35-9 | 6-1 | 27-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
| 2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 444, Kym reached the qualifications after beating Nino Serdarusic 3-6 6-0 6-3.
In the qualifications against Serdarusic, Kym recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-0 6-3). During the match Kym scored 84 points vs Serdarusic’s 67. Jerome was quite aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Kym recorded 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jerome Kym lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kym put 59% of his first serves in, winning 79% (38/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. Jerome broke Serdarusic 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Prostejov Challenger where he beat Chun Hsin Tseng in the final 6-2 3-6 6-2.
The Swiss has a compiled 31-8 win-loss record in 2024, 23-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Alex Kodat | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 24 |
| Pts | 69-55 | 84-67 |
| Total Points | 124 | 151 |
| Winners | 33 | 38 |
| %Winners | 48% | 45% |
Both Alex Kodat and Kym played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jerome Kym surrendered 1 set while Toby Alex Kodat hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Alex Kodat has played 1 set(s) less than Kym (2 vs 3). Therefore, Alex Kodat played 6 games less than Kym. The American scored 33 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Kym recorded 38 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Alex Kodat | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 44/61 | 48/82 |
| %1st in | 72% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 38/48 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 15/34 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 44% |
Alex Kodat struck 4 aces . Kym fired 5 aces . Alex Kodat won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Kym won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Alex Kodat | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 43% | 56% |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points. Kym broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Kym conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Alex Kodat | |||
| Q1 Ilkel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 69-55 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 44/61 | 44/61 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kym | |||
| Q1 Serdarusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 84-67 | 84-67 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/82 | 48/82 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 38/48 | 38/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/34 | 15/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWWL
LWWWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Martin KrumichKrumich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Dennis NovakNovak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Jiri VeselyVesely (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Martin KlizanKlizan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian GimaGima – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
