Emily Appleton and Naiktha Bains will face off in the qualifications of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on Court 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Naiktha Bains who should win in 3 sets.
Naiktha Bains -> 1.87
Emily Appleton -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Emily Appleton vs. Naiktha Bains
There is no head to head record between Emily Appleton and Naiktha Bains since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emily Appleton
24 - 15win/loss
354
353
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-18 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 11-8 | 6-4 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 29-31 | 6-3 | 9-14 | 9-9 | 3-4 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 20-22 | 4-4 | 3-9 | 13-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-11 | 6-8 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-8 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 399, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Yexin Ma 7-66 6-0.
In the qualifications, Appleton had a good straight sets win against Ma (7-66 6-0). During the match, Appleton scored 74 points vs Ma’s 55. Emily was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Appleton blasted 2 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Emily Appleton lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Appleton put 61% of her first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind her 1st serve and 36% (10/28) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Ma 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Appleton has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 51% of her matches (180-176). 5-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Appleton has an overall12-17 record in the last 9 years on grass.
The Brit has an overall 23-15 win-loss record in 2024, 5-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Naiktha Bains
17 - 12win/loss
497
199
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-20 | 7-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-25 | 23-20 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-23 | 9-9 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 581, Bains got to the qualifications after beating Katarzyna Kawa 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Naiktha had a good straight sets win against Kawa (6-3 6-3). During the match Bains scored 58 points vs Kawa’s 50. Bains was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Bains made 2 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Naiktha Bains lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Bains put 61% of her first serves in, winning 64% (21/33) of the points behind her 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Kawa 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
The Brit has a composed 17-11 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Appleton | Bains |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 18 |
| Pts | 74-55 | 58-50 |
| Total Points | 129 | 108 |
| Winners | 30 | 21 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Both Appleton and Bains played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Appleton and Bains have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Appleton played 1 game more than Bains. The Brit scored 30 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Bains fired 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Appleton | Bains |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 44/72 | 33/54 |
| %1st in | 61% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 21/33 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 62% |
Appleton struck 2 aces . Bains fired 2 aces . Appleton won 68% points behind her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Bains won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Appleton | Bains |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 67% | 44% |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 63% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Emily broke her opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Emily conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 63% of the break points that she conceded. The Brit broke her opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Naiktha conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Appleton | |||
| Q1 Ma | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 74-55 | 74-55 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 44/72 | 44/72 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/28 | 10/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Bains | |||
| Q1 Kawa | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 58-50 | 58-50 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 33/54 | 33/54 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 21/33 | 21/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Jelle SelsSels – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Yshai OlielOliel (6-2 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc SieberSieber – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-67 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Alexandre MullerMuller (3-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Destanee AiavaAiava (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Kayla DayDay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Nao HibinoHibino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Katie BoulterBoulter (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Francesca JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction