Lucrezia Stefanini and Talia Gibson will face off in the qualifications of the Rothesay Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on Court 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lucrezia Stefanini who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lucrezia Stefanini is the pick to win this match.
Lucrezia Stefanini -> 1.57
Talia Gibson -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lucrezia Stefanini vs. Talia Gibson
This will be the 2nd time that Lucrezia Stefanini and Talia Gibson fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Stefanini (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they squared off, Stefanini won 6-4 6-0 in the final in the Novo back in June 2024.
Lucrezia Stefanini
18 - 15win/loss
150
99
LLWWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-17 | 5-2 | 6-8 | 5-5 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-23 | 22-12 | 6-6 | 4-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-30 | 16-7 | 13-13 | 5-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-24 | 24-15 | 16-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-9 | 8-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, Stefanini got to the qualifications after beating Amarni Banks 6-4 2-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Stefanini defeated Banks (6-4 2-6 6-4). During the match, Stefanini scored 88 points vs Banks’s 86. Lucrezia was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stefanini was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Lucrezia Stefanini lost the serve 7 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Stefanini put 79% of her first serves in, winning 51% (36/71) of the points behind her 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Stefanini broke Banks 7 times after converting 64% of her break points (7/11).
Stefanini has a winning match record in the last 9 years having won 57% of her matches (270-201). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Stefanini has a compiled8-7 record in the last 9 years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title the Novo where she beat Talia Gibson in the final 6-4 6-0.
Lucrezia has a composed 17-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
Stefanini has never competed in this tournament before.
Talia Gibson
17 - 14win/loss
178
177
LWWLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 9-5 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-29 | 40-23 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| 2022 | 50-20 | 48-18 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 185, the Australian reached the qualifications after beating Mirjam Bjorklund 7-5 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Bjorklund (7-5 6-2). During the match Gibson scored 67 points vs Bjorklund’s 53. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Gibson blasted 4 aces and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Talia Gibson lost the serve 3 times and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gibson put 71% of her first serves in, winning 57% (24/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the 2nd serve. Talia broke Bjorklund 6 times after converting 60% of her break points (6/10).
Talia’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the W75 Maribor and the Novo.
The Australian has a composed 17-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stefanini | Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 20 |
| Pts | 88-86 | 67-53 |
| Total Points | 174 | 120 |
| Winners | 36 | 24 |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% |
Both Stefanini and Gibson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Lucrezia Stefanini dropped 1 set while Talia Gibson hasn’t conceded a set so far. Stefanini has played 1 set more than Gibson (3 vs 2). Therefore, Stefanini played 8 games more than Gibson. Lucrezia scored 36 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Gibson bagged 24 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stefanini | Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 71/90 | 42/59 |
| %1st in | 79% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 36/71 | 24/42 |
| %1st pts | 51% | 57% |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/17 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 59% |
Stefanini didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gibson made 4 aces . Stefanini won 51% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Gibson won 57% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stefanini | Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/11 | 6/10 |
| % Converted | 64% | 60% |
| Conceded | 12 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 42% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 7 | 3 |
Lucrezia broke her opponent 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. Stefanini conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 42% of the break points that she conceded. The Australian broke her opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Gibson conceded her serve 3 times and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
| Stefanini | |||
| Q1 Banks |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 88-86 | 88-86 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 71/90 | 71/90 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 36/71 | 36/71 | |
| % 1st pts | 51% | 51% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/12 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 42% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
| Gibson | |||
| Q1 Bjorklund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-53 | 67-53 | |
| Total points | 120 | 120 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/59 | 42/59 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWWW
LWWLWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Marc SieberSieber – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-67 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Alexandre MullerMuller (3-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jelle SelsSels – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Yshai OlielOliel (6-2 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Destanee AiavaAiava (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Kayla DayDay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Nao HibinoHibino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Katie BoulterBoulter (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Francesca JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
