Alexandra Eala and Ena Shibahara will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Rothesay Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on Court 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alexandra Eala who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alexandra Eala is the pick to win this match.
Alexandra Eala -> 1.6
Ena Shibahara -> 2.24
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alexandra Eala vs. Ena Shibahara
There is no head to head record between Alexandra Eala and Ena Shibahara since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Alexandra Eala
17 - 17win/loss
163
143
LLWWLLLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-29 | 22-16 | 3-6 | 7-4 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-23 | 37-16 | 0-3 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 45-20 | 30-13 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-13 | 10-7 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-4 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157 (career-high), Alexandra reached the qualifications after beating Sarah Beth Grey 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Filipino had a good straight sets win against Beth Askew (6-3 6-4). During the match, Eala scored 69 points vs Beth Askew’s 53. The Filipino was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Eala scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 2 double faults. Alexandra Eala lost the serve 4 times and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Eala put 71% of her first serves in, winning 51% (18/35) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the 2nd serve. The Filipino broke Beth Askew 7 times after converting 39% of her break points (7/18).
Eala has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 63% of her matches (129-76). 1-0 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Eala has an aggregate1-0 record in the last 6 years on grass.
Alexandra’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the W50 Indore.
Alexandra has a compiled 17-16 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Nottingham
The Filipino has never competed in this tournament before.
Ena Shibahara
30 - 8win/loss
133
132
WWLWWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51-19 | 42-14 | 5-3 | 2-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-15 | 12-12 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 16-15 | 11-8 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 279 (career-high), Shibahara reached the qualifications after defeating Maddison Inglis 7-61 6-2.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Inglis (7-61 6-2). During the match Shibahara scored 73 points vs Inglis’s 56. The American was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Shibahara managed to score 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Ena Shibahara lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Shibahara put 63% of her first serves in, winning 83% (33/40) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Inglis 3 times after converting 75% of her break points (3/4).
Her best result of the year was winning the title the W35 Spring where she beat Iva Jovic in the final 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Ena has a compiled 29-8 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Eala | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 69-53 | 73-56 |
| Total Points | 122 | 129 |
| Winners | 18 | 33 |
| %Winners | 26% | 45% |
Both Eala and Shibahara played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Eala and Shibahara have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Eala played 2 games less than Shibahara. Eala scored 18 winners (26% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 33 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Eala | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 40/64 |
| %1st in | 71% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 18/35 | 33/40 |
| %1st pts | 51% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 11/24 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 46% |
Eala fired 1 ace . Shibahara also scored 4 aces . Eala won 51% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Shibahara won 83% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Eala | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 3 |
| Converted | 7/18 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 39% | 75% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 20% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 |
The Filipino broke her opponent 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Eala dropped her serve 4 times and she saved 20% of the break points that she conceded. Ena broke her opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Ena conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
| Eala | |||
| Q1 Beth Askew |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-53 | 69-53 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 35/49 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 51% | 51% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| Converted % | 39% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/5 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 20% | 20% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Shibahara | |||
| Q1 Inglis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 73-56 | 73-56 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 40/64 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 33/40 | 33/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLLWWL
WWLWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham
- Marc SieberSieber – Tristan LamasineLamasine (7-67 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Alexandre MullerMuller (3-6 6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jelle SelsSels – Evgeny TyurnevTyurnev (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Yshai OlielOliel (6-2 2-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimberly BirrellBirrell – Destanee AiavaAiava (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naiktha BainsBains – Emily AppletonAppleton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Kayla DayDay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clara BurelBurel – Daria GavrilovaGavrilova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – Diane ParryParry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Nao HibinoHibino (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tatjana MariaMaria – Emiliana ArangoArango (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Katie BoulterBoulter (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Francesca JonesJones (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – Marta KostyukKostyuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
