Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn will square off in the quarter of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.

As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.62
Ethan Quinn -> 2.18

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Ethan Quinn

There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

14 - 14win/loss

Hard
14-11
I Hard
0-1
Clay
0-2
Rank
159
High
128
LLWLWLWWLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 38-34 36-24 0-2 2-4 0-4 0-0
2023 53-27 42-19 9-7 2-1 0-0 0-0
2022 24-19 20-12 3-5 1-2 0-0 0-0
2021 11-7 5-4 6-3 0-0 0-0 0-0
2020 2-4 2-4 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 181, Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after beating Cannon Kingsley 7-5 6-4 and Stefan Kozlov 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret..

In the 2nd round against Kozlov, Chak had a free pass after Kozlov retired on a 4-6 6-4 4-1 . scoreline.

Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (104-78). 13-11 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed83-57 record in the last 6 years on hard.

The’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.

Lam Coleman Wong has a composed 13-14 win-loss record in 2024, 13-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Tyler Challenger

Chak has never competed in this tournament before.

Tyler Challenger
Lam Coleman Wong's Record

Ethan Quinn

Ethan Quinn

14 - 18win/loss

Hard
7-7
I Hard
5-4
Clay
2-7
Rank
240
High
216
WWWLLWWLLW
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 31-34 17-18 2-7 11-8 1-1 0-0
2023 21-16 12-11 0-0 8-4 1-1 0-0
2022 30-14 21-7 6-4 3-3 0-0 0-0
2021 4-3 4-3 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0

Ranked no. 252, Ethan reached the quarter after defeating Adam Neff 6-4 6-75 6-3, Alex Rybakov 2-6 6-2 7-62, Leo Borg 4-6 6-2 6-2 and Hiroki Moriya 7-65 7-5.

In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Moriya (7-65 7-5). During the match Quinn scored 91 points vs Moriya’s 85. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.

About the serving games, Quinn bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 64% of his first serves in, winning 60% (30/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Moriya 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Quinn started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.

Ethan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger.

Ethan has an overall 14-17 win-loss record in 2024, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Tyler Challenger
Quinn's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament

C.Lam Wong
E.Quinn
4h:30
4h:30
Time on court​
!
9h:23
9h:23
!
2h:51
2h:51
Last match​
!
2h:20
2h:20
2
2
Match played
!
4
4
47
47
Games Played​
112
112
6
6
Set played​​
11
11
165
165
Total points​
394
394
82.5
82.5
Avg point​
98.5
98.5
62
62
Winners
165
165
31
31
Avg Winners​
41.3
41.3
38%
38%
Ratio winners
42%
42%
-- Serve --
16
16
Aces
16
16
8
8
Avg Aces
4
4
5
5
Double Faults
20
20
2.5
2.5
Avg Double Faults
5
5
62/82
62/82
1st won total​
165/235
165/235
!
76%
76%
1st won %
70%
70%
31/60
31/60
2nd won total​
69/132
69/132
52%
52%
2nd won %
52%
52%
-- Break Points --
7/26
7/26
BP won
15/44
15/44
3.5/13
3.5/13
Avg BP won
3.8/11
3.8/11
!
27%
27%
Won
34%
34%
10
10
Conceded
30
30
5
5
Avg Conceded
7.5
7.5
3
3
Broken
9
9
1.5
1.5
Avg Broken
2.3
2.3
7
7
Saved
21
21

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Lam Coleman Wong Quinn
Match played 2 4
Tot Set 6 11
Tot Games 47 112
Pts 165-144 394-354
Total Points 309 748
Winners 62 165
%Winners 38% 42%

Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Quinn competed in 4 matches. Quinn started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set, while Ethan Quinn lost 3 sets. Lam Coleman Wong has played 5 set(s) less than Quinn (6 vs 11). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 65 games less than Quinn. The scored 62 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Ethan fired 165 winners (42%).

Serve Performance

Serve Lam Coleman Wong Quinn
Aces 16 16
Avg per match 8 4
1st in 82/142 235/367
%1st in 58% 64%
1st pts 62/82 165/235
%1st pts 76% 70%
2nd pts 31/60 69/132
%2nd pts 52% 52%

Lam Coleman Wong blasted 16 aces (8 per match). Quinn struck 16 aces (4 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Lam Coleman Wong Quinn
Won 7 15
Converted 7/26 15/44
% Converted 27% 34%
Conceded 10 30
Saved 7 21
% Saved 70% 70%
Times Broken 3 9

Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponents 7 times with a 27% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 15 times with a 34% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.

Lam Coleman Wong
R1
Kingsley
R2
Kozlov
Total
Score 7-5 6-4 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret.
Tot Set 2 3 5
Tot Games 22 25 47
pts 76-62 89-82 165-144
Total points 138 171 309
Winners 27 35 62
%Winners 36% 39% 38%
SERVE
Aces 9 7 16
Double Faults 2 3 5
1st in 33/61 49/81 82/142
% 1st in 54% 60% 58%
1st pts 27/33 35/49 62/82
% 1st pts 82% 71% 76%
2nd pts 16/28 15/32 31/60
% 2nd pts 57% 47% 52%
Breaks
Won 3 4 7
Converted 3/14 4/12 7/26
Converted % 21% 33% 27%
Conceded 5 5 10
Saved 4/5 3/5 7
Saved % 80% 60% 70%
Times Broken 1 2 3
Quinn
Q1
Neff
Q3
Rybakov
R1
Borg
R2
Moriya
Total
Score 6-4 6-75 6-3 2-6 6-2 7-62 4-6 6-2 6-2 7-65 7-5
Tot Set 3 3 3 2 11
Tot Games 32 29 26 25 112
pts 113-98 97-93 93-78 91-85 394-354
Total points 211 190 171 176 748
Winners 50 48 37 30 165
%Winners 44% 49% 40% 33% 42%
SERVE
Aces 9 1 4 2 16
Double Faults 8 6 4 2 20
1st in 67/105 67/100 51/84 50/78 235/367
% 1st in 64% 67% 61% 64% 64%
1st pts 50/67 48/67 37/51 30/50 165/235
% 1st pts 75% 72% 73% 60% 70%
2nd pts 20/38 16/33 15/33 18/28 69/132
% 2nd pts 53% 48% 45% 64% 52%
Breaks
Won 3 2 6 4 15
Converted 3/16 2/7 6/10 4/11 15/44
Converted % 19% 29% 60% 36% 34%
Conceded 8 5 10 7 30
Saved 7/8 3/5 7/10 4/7 21
Saved % 88% 60% 70% 57% 138%
Times Broken 1 2 3 3 9

Upcoming matches in the draw