Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn will square off in the quarter of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.62
Ethan Quinn -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Ethan Quinn
There is no head to head record between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Ethan Quinn since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
14 - 14win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Lam Coleman Wong reached the quarter after beating Cannon Kingsley 7-5 6-4 and Stefan Kozlov 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret..
In the 2nd round against Kozlov, Chak had a free pass after Kozlov retired on a 4-6 6-4 4-1 . scoreline.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (104-78). 13-11 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed83-57 record in the last 6 years on hard.
The’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Lam Coleman Wong has a composed 13-14 win-loss record in 2024, 13-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-34 | 17-18 | 2-7 | 13-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, Ethan reached the quarter after defeating Adam Neff 6-4 6-75 6-3, Alex Rybakov 2-6 6-2 7-62, Leo Borg 4-6 6-2 6-2 and Hiroki Moriya 7-65 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The American had a good straight sets win against Moriya (7-65 7-5). During the match Quinn scored 91 points vs Moriya’s 85. Quinn was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Quinn bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 64% of his first serves in, winning 60% (30/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 64% (18/28) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Moriya 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Quinn started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Ethan’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
Ethan has an overall 14-17 win-loss record in 2024, 7-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 47 | 112 |
| Pts | 165-144 | 394-354 |
| Total Points | 309 | 748 |
| Winners | 62 | 165 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Quinn competed in 4 matches. Quinn started his run from the qualifications while Lam Coleman Wong had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set, while Ethan Quinn lost 3 sets. Lam Coleman Wong has played 5 set(s) less than Quinn (6 vs 11). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 65 games less than Quinn. The scored 62 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Ethan fired 165 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 82/142 | 235/367 |
| %1st in | 58% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 62/82 | 165/235 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 31/60 | 69/132 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 52% |
Lam Coleman Wong blasted 16 aces (8 per match). Quinn struck 16 aces (4 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Quinn won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Quinn |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 15 |
| Converted | 7/26 | 15/44 |
| % Converted | 27% | 34% |
| Conceded | 10 | 30 |
| Saved | 7 | 21 |
| % Saved | 70% | 70% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 9 |
Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponents 7 times with a 27% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponents 15 times with a 34% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | ||||
| R1 Kingsley |
R2 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 25 | 47 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 89-82 | 165-144 | |
| Total points | 138 | 171 | 309 | |
| Winners | 27 | 35 | 62 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 33/61 | 49/81 | 82/142 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 60% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 35/49 | 62/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 15/32 | 31/60 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 47% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 4/12 | 7/26 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 33% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 3/5 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 60% | 70% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Quinn | ||||||
| Q1 Neff |
Q3 Rybakov |
R1 Borg |
R2 Moriya |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | 2-6 6-2 7-62 | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 29 | 26 | 25 | 112 | |
| pts | 113-98 | 97-93 | 93-78 | 91-85 | 394-354 | |
| Total points | 211 | 190 | 171 | 176 | 748 | |
| Winners | 50 | 48 | 37 | 30 | 165 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 49% | 40% | 33% | 42% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 20 | |
| 1st in | 67/105 | 67/100 | 51/84 | 50/78 | 235/367 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 67% | 61% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 50/67 | 48/67 | 37/51 | 30/50 | 165/235 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 72% | 73% | 60% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 16/33 | 15/33 | 18/28 | 69/132 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 48% | 45% | 64% | 52% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 3/16 | 2/7 | 6/10 | 4/11 | 15/44 | |
| Converted % | 19% | 29% | 60% | 36% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 30 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/7 | 21 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 60% | 70% | 57% | 138% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
WWWWWLLWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Brandon HoltHolt (1-1) – H2H and prediction
