Ryan Peniston and Kyle Edmund will play each other in the qualifications of the Surbiton Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ryan Peniston who should win in 3 sets.
Ryan Peniston -> 1.85
Kyle Edmund -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Ryan Peniston vs. Kyle Edmund
There is no head to head record between Ryan Peniston and Kyle Edmund since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ryan Peniston
4 - 8win/loss
271
123
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-11 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 20-12 | 1-8 | 7-4 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 31-26 | 4-8 | 5-4 | 13-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-23 | 25-9 | 12-4 | 9-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-12 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 215, Ryan got to the qualifications after beating Luke Saville 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications, Ryan had a good straight sets win against Saville (6-3 6-1). During the match, Peniston scored 58 points vs Saville’s 41. Peniston was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Peniston fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ryan Peniston lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Peniston put 58% of his first serves in, winning 62% (18/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the 2nd serve. Peniston broke Saville 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Peniston has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 61% of his matches (240-153). 1-0 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Peniston has an overall17-17 match record in the last 8 years on grass.
The Brit has an aggregate 4-7 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Kyle Edmund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 13-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 14-16 | 1-7 | 7-6 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 5-5 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 496, Edmund reached the qualifications after defeating Li Tu 6-1 7-64.
In the qualifications, Kyle had a good straight sets win against Tu (6-1 7-64). During the match Edmund scored 66 points vs Tu’s 51. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Edmund managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Kyle Edmund was quite efficient on serve to win 81% (30/37) of his 1st serve and 72% (18/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Tu twice.
Edmund’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Loughborough and M25 Sunderland.
Edmund has an overall 18-11 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Kyle has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Peniston | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 58-41 | 66-51 |
| Total Points | 99 | 117 |
| Winners | 18 | 30 |
| %Winners | 31% | 45% |
Both Peniston and Edmund played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Peniston and Edmund have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Peniston played 4 games less than Edmund. Peniston scored 18 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit managed to score 30 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Peniston | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 37/62 |
| %1st in | 58% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 18/29 | 30/37 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 18/25 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 72% |
Peniston struck 2 aces . Edmund bagged 6 aces . Peniston won 62% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Edmund won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 72% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Peniston | Edmund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 75% | 100% |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 |
| Saved | 4 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The Brit broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Ryan dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Kyle was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Peniston | |||
| Q1 Saville | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 58-41 | 58-41 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 29/50 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 18/29 | 18/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Edmund | |||
| Q1 Tu | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 66-51 | 66-51 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/62 | 37/62 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/37 | 30/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/25 | 18/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 72% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Daniel EvansEvans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction