Omar Jasika and Paul Jubb will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Surbiton Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
Paul Jubb -> 1.38
Omar Jasika -> 2.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Omar Jasika vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Omar Jasika and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Omar Jasika
19 - 14win/loss
221
204
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-18 | 17-9 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-26 | 34-20 | 0-2 | 0-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 70-23 | 63-20 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 206, Omar got to the qualifications after beating Hamish Stewart 3-6 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications against Stewart, Omar recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-4). During the match, Jasika scored 84 points vs Stewart’s 81. Omar was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jasika scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Omar Jasika was quite effective on serve to win 71% (39/55) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Australian broke Stewart 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Jasika has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (219-125). 1-0 on grass in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Jasika has an aggregate 6-3 record in the last years on grass.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Burnie 1 Challenger where he defeated Alex Bolt in the final 6-2 6-7(2) 6-3.
Jasika has an aggregate 19-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Omar has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
31 - 13win/loss
201
196
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-18 | 20-7 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 308, Jubb reached the qualifications after defeating Charles Broom 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Broom (6-2 6-4). During the match Jubb scored 72 points vs Broom’s 55. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb struck 2 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was quite efficient on serve to win 77% (27/35) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Broom 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Jubb’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Paul has an aggregate 30-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jasika | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 18 |
| Pts | 84-81 | 72-55 |
| Total Points | 165 | 127 |
| Winners | 39 | 27 |
| %Winners | 46% | 38% |
Both Jasika and Jubb played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Omar Jasika surrendered 1 set while Paul Jubb hasn’t lost a set so far. Jasika has played 1 set more than Jubb (3 vs 2). Therefore, Jasika played 11 games more than Jubb. Jasika scored 39 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Jubb made 27 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jasika | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 2 |
| 1st in | 55/77 | 35/66 |
| %1st in | 71% | 53% |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 27/35 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 16/31 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 52% |
Jasika managed to score 1 ace . Jubb also blasted 2 aces . Jasika won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jasika | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 50% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 7 |
| Saved | 1 | 6 |
| % Saved | 25% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Paul broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jasika | |||
| Q1 Stewart | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 84-81 | 84-81 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/77 | 55/77 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Broom | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 35/66 | 35/66 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 27/35 | 27/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 6/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 86% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Daniel EvansEvans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction