Tristan Schoolkate and Clement Chidekh will face off in the qualifications of the Surbiton Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.52
Clement Chidekh -> 2.42
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Clement Chidekh
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Clement Chidekh since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
22 - 13win/loss
168
167
LLLWWWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-33 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 186 (career-high), Schoolkate got to the qualifications after beating Ryan Seggerman 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Seggerman (6-4 6-3). During the match, Schoolkate scored 63 points vs Seggerman’s 48. Tristan was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate bagged 6 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Tristan Schoolkate was quite effective on serve to win 80% (32/40) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Tristan broke Seggerman twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Schoolkate has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (147-101). 1-0 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has an overall16-5 win-loss record in the last 6 years on grass.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 21-13 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Clement Chidekh
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 64-26 | 17-7 | 7-6 | 39-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-17 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 24-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 11-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 26-5 | 23-4 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 280, the French player got to the qualifications after beating Blake Mott 7-5 7-5.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Mott (7-5 7-5). During the match Chidekh scored 75 points vs Mott’s 67. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Chidekh managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Clement Chidekh lost the serve 3 times. Furthermore, Chidekh put 54% of his first serves in, winning 66% (23/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (17/30) on the 2nd serve. Chidekh broke Mott 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Glasgow Challenger where he defeated Paul Jubb in the final 0-6 6-4 6-1.
Chidekh has an overall 35-12 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 24 |
| Pts | 63-48 | 75-67 |
| Total Points | 111 | 142 |
| Winners | 32 | 23 |
| %Winners | 51% | 31% |
Both Schoolkate and Chidekh played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Schoolkate and Chidekh have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Schoolkate played 5 games less than Chidekh. The Australian scored 32 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Clement bagged 23 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 40/54 | 35/65 |
| %1st in | 74% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 23/35 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 17/30 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 57% |
Schoolkate scored 6 aces . Chidekh recorded 2 aces . Schoolkate won 80% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Chidekh won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 63% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The Australian broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Schoolkate had a solid display on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points. Clement broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Clement conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||
| Q1 Seggerman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-48 | 63-48 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/54 | 40/54 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 32/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Chidekh | |||
| Q1 Mott |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 75-67 | 75-67 | |
| Total points | 142 | 142 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/65 | 35/65 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 23/35 | 23/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/30 | 17/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 0/3 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLWWL
WWWWWLLLWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Alex BoltBolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Daniel EvansEvans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime CressyCressy – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
