Bautista Vilicich and Emilio Gomez will face off in the qualifications of the Santa Fe Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.74
Bautista Vilicich -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bautista Vilicich vs. Emilio Gomez
There is no head to head record between Bautista Vilicich and Emilio Gomez since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Bautista Vilicich
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-13 | 0-0 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 4-3 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-15 | 4-3 | 16-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 721, Bautista got to the qualifications after defeating Lautaro Agustin Corthey 6-2 7-5.
In the qualifications, Vilicich had a good straight sets win against Agustin Corthey (6-2 7-5). During the match, Vilicich scored 69 points vs Agustin Corthey’s 52. Vilicich was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Vilicich was unable to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Bautista Vilicich lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Vilicich put 64% of his first serves in, winning 64% (23/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 55% (11/20) on the 2nd serve. Bautista broke Agustin Corthey 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Vilicich has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 62% of his matches (80-50). 14-8 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Vilicich has a composed73-44 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Vilicich’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Antalya and M15 Bragado.
Bautista has an aggregate 14-9 win-loss record in 2024, 14-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Santa Fe Challenger
Bautista has never competed in this tournament before.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 788, the Ecuadorian reached the qualifications after beating Marcos Lee Chan Baratau 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Emilio had a good straight sets win against Lee Chan Baratau (6-1 6-1). During the match Gomez scored 55 points vs Lee Chan Baratau’s 25. The Ecuadorian was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about serving, Gomez scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Emilio Gomez was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 90% (9/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Emilio broke Lee Chan Baratau 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Emilio has a composed 5-5 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Vilicich | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 14 |
| Pts | 69-52 | 55-25 |
| Total Points | 121 | 80 |
| Winners | 23 | 22 |
| %Winners | 33% | 40% |
Both Vilicich and Gomez played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Vilicich and Gomez have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Vilicich played 6 games more than Gomez. The Argentine scored 23 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Gomez bagged 22 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Vilicich | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 31/41 |
| %1st in | 64% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 23/36 | 22/31 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 9/10 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 90% |
Vilicich didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Gomez made 1 ace . Vilicich won 64% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Gomez won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 90% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Vilicich | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 5 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 55% | 63% |
| Conceded | 4 | 1 |
| Saved | 1 | 1 |
| % Saved | 25% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Vilicich dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Emilio broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Gomez was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Vilicich | |||
| Q1 Agustin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-52 | 69-52 | |
| Total points | 121 | 121 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/56 | 36/56 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 23/36 | 23/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/20 | 11/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Gomez | |||
| Q1 Lee Chan Baratau |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 55-25 | 55-25 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 31/41 | 31/41 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/10 | 9/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 90% | 90% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWLL
LLLWWLWLLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Juan Sebastian GomezSebastian Gomez – Trey HilderbrandHilderbrand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Wilson LeiteLeite (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hady HabibHabib – Diego Augusto Barreto SanchezAugusto Barreto Sanchez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leonardo AboianAboian – Rafael TosettoTosetto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas FarjatFarjat – Franco RiberoRibero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
