Rudy Quan and Andres Andrade will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andres Andrade who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andres Andrade is the pick to win this match.
Andres Andrade -> 1.178
Rudy Quan -> 4.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudy Quan vs. Andres Andrade
This will be the 3rd time that Rudy Quan and Andres Andrade face off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Quan won 7-6(4) 7-5 in the quarter in M15 Orange Park back in May 2024.
Rudy Quan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-10 | 12-5 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 13-11 | 13-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Quan got to the 2nd round after beating Shintaro Imai 4-6 6-4 6-2, Filip Peliwo 6-4 6-2 and Stefan Kozlov 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round, Quan had a good straight sets win against Kozlov (6-1 7-5). During the match, Quan scored 69 points vs Kozlov’s 51. Rudy was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quan wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Rudy Quan lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Quan put 68% of his first serves in, winning 60% (25/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Rudy broke Kozlov 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Quan has a solid match record in the last 2 years having won 61% of his matches (25-16). 6-1 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quan has a compiled19-11 record in the last 2 years on hard.
Rudy’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Orange Park.
The American has an overall 12-5 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Andres Andrade
34 - 12win/loss
241
232
LLWWLLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-26 | 11-12 | 34-12 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-21 | 16-10 | 7-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-12 | 15-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323 (career-high), the Ecuadorian reached the 2nd round after defeating Chak Lam Coleman Wong 6-75 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Lam Coleman Wong, Andres recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-4 6-3). During the match Andrade scored 100 points vs Lam Coleman Wong’s 91. The Ecuadorian was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Andrade made 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Andres Andrade lost the serve 5 times. Furthermore, Andrade put 50% of his first serves in, winning 65% (31/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (24/48) on the 2nd serve. The Ecuadorian broke Lam Coleman Wong 8 times after converting 73% of his break points (8/11).
Andres’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Palm Coast,M25 Naples,M25 Santo Domingo,the Savannah Challenger and M25 Pensacola.
Andres has an overall 34-11 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quan | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 65 | 32 |
| Pts | 228-186 | 100-91 |
| Total Points | 414 | 191 |
| Winners | 81 | 31 |
| %Winners | 36% | 31% |
Quan played 3 matches while Andrade competed in 1 match. Quan started his run from the qualifications while Andrade had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Rudy Quan lost 1 set, while Andres Andrade surrendered 1 set. Quan has played 4 sets more than Andrade (7 vs 3). Therefore, Quan played 33 games more than Andrade. The American scored 81 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Andrade recorded 31 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quan | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 133/189 | 48/96 |
| %1st in | 70% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 81/133 | 31/48 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 26/56 | 24/48 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 50% |
Quan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Andrade scored 2 aces . Quan won 61% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Andrade won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quan | Andrade |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 19 | 8 |
| Converted | 19/37 | 8/11 |
| % Converted | 51% | 73% |
| Conceded | 20 | 5 |
| Saved | 9 | 0 |
| % Saved | 45% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 11 | 5 |
The American broke his opponents 19 times with a 51% conversion rate. Rudy surrendered his serve 11 times and he saved 45% of the break points that he conceded. The Ecuadorian broke his opponent 8 times with a 73% conversion rate. Andrade conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quan | |||||
| Q1 Imai |
Q3 Peliwo |
R1 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 18 | 19 | 65 | |
| pts | 101-93 | 58-42 | 69-51 | 228-186 | |
| Total points | 194 | 100 | 120 | 414 | |
| Winners | 36 | 20 | 25 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 34% | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 55/76 | 36/51 | 42/62 | 133/189 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 71% | 68% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 36/55 | 20/36 | 25/42 | 81/133 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 56% | 60% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 6/15 | 10/20 | 26/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 40% | 50% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 6 | 19 | |
| Converted | 6/19 | 7/7 | 6/11 | 19/37 | |
| Converted % | 32% | 100% | 55% | 51% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 8 | 6 | 20 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 4/8 | 3/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 50% | 50% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Andrade | |||||
| R1 Lam Coleman Wong |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-4 6-3 | ||||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |||
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |||
| pts | 100-91 | 100-91 | |||
| Total points | 191 | 191 | |||
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |||
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |||
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |||
| 1st in | 48/96 | 48/96 | |||
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |||
| 1st pts | 31/48 | 31/48 | |||
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |||
| 2nd pts | 24/48 | 24/48 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 8 | 8 | |||
| Converted | 8/11 | 8/11 | |||
| Converted % | 73% | 73% | |||
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |||
| Saved | 0/5 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |||
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWLL
LLWWLLLWLW Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Aidan MayoMayo (7-67 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-4 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
