Andres Martin and Trevor Svajda will face off in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 13. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Trevor Svajda who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Trevor Svajda is the pick to win this match.
Trevor Svajda -> 1.75
Andres Martin -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andres Martin vs. Trevor Svajda
There is no head to head record between Andres Martin and Trevor Svajda since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Andres Martin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-13 | 13-10 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-17 | 14-11 | 1-2 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-8 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 529, Martin got to the 2nd round after beating Osgar O’Hoisin 6-4 6-4, Bruno Kuzuhara 6-1 4-6 6-4 and Yu Hsiou Hsu 7-61 6-2.
In the 1st round, Andres had a good straight sets win against Hsiou Hsu (7-61 6-2). During the match, Martin scored 74 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 55. Andres was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Andres Martin was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (23/29) of his 1st serve and 67% (22/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Hsiou Hsu 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Martin has a solid record in the last 3 years having won 61% of his matches (39-25). 3-0 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Martin has an aggregate31-18 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
Andres has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Martin has never competed in this tournament before.
Trevor Svajda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-8 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 9-7 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 732, Trevor reached the 2nd round after beating Ernesto Escobedo 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Svajda had a good straight sets win against Escobedo (6-3 6-4). During the match Svajda scored 63 points vs Escobedo’s 52. Trevor was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Svajda blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Trevor Svajda was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 80% (24/30) of his 1st serve and 61% (17/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Svajda broke Escobedo twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Trevor’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Calabasas.
Svajda has a compiled 8-3 win-loss record in 2024, 8-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 68 | 19 |
| Pts | 228-184 | 63-52 |
| Total Points | 412 | 115 |
| Winners | 91 | 24 |
| %Winners | 40% | 38% |
Martin played 3 matches while Svajda competed in 1 match. Martin started his run from the qualifications while Svajda had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Andres Martin dropped 1 set while Trevor Svajda hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Martin has played 5 sets more than Svajda (7 vs 2). Therefore, Martin played 49 games more than Svajda. Martin scored 91 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Trevor recorded 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 17 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 5.7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 117/210 | 30/58 |
| %1st in | 56% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 91/117 | 24/30 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 53/93 | 17/28 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 61% |
Martin struck 17 aces (5.7 per match). Svajda bagged 6 aces . Martin won 78% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Svajda won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin | Svajda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 2 |
| Converted | 11/22 | 2/6 |
| % Converted | 50% | 33% |
| Conceded | 13 | 0 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 62% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
The American broke his opponents 11 times with a 50% conversion rate. Andres lost his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Svajda broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Trevor was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Martin | |||||
| Q1 O’Hoisin |
Q3 Kuzuhara |
R1 Hsiou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | 7-61 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 27 | 21 | 68 | |
| pts | 67-53 | 87-76 | 74-55 | 228-184 | |
| Total points | 120 | 163 | 129 | 412 | |
| Winners | 21 | 47 | 23 | 91 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 54% | 31% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 11 | 2 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 28/53 | 60/95 | 29/62 | 117/210 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 63% | 47% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 47/60 | 23/29 | 91/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 78% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 15/35 | 22/33 | 53/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 43% | 67% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/7 | 3/6 | 11/22 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 57% | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 3 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 5/7 | 2/3 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 71% | 67% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| Svajda | |||||
| R1 Escobedo |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |||
| pts | 63-52 | 63-52 | |||
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |||
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |||
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |||
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |||
| 1st in | 30/58 | 30/58 | |||
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |||
| 1st pts | 24/30 | 24/30 | |||
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |||
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |||
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |||
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |||
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |||
| Saved % | – | 0% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLW
LLWLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Aidan MayoMayo (7-67 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-4 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
