Nishesh Basavareddy and Christian Langmo will square off in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nishesh Basavareddy who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Nishesh Basavareddy is the pick to win this match.
Nishesh Basavareddy -> 1.37
Christian Langmo -> 2.93
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Nishesh Basavareddy vs. Christian Langmo
This will be the 2nd time that Nishesh Basavareddy and Christian Langmo play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Basavareddy (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Basavareddy won 6-3 6-4 in the qualifications in the Tiburon Challenger back in 2023.
Nishesh Basavareddy
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 411, Basavareddy got to the 2nd round after beating Ethan Quinn 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, Basavareddy had a good straight sets win against Quinn (7-5 6-4). During the match, Basavareddy scored 73 points vs Quinn’s 60. The American was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Basavareddy made 5 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Nishesh Basavareddy was very efficient on serve to win 81% (21/26) of his 1st serve and 71% (25/35) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Basavareddy broke Quinn twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Basavareddy has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 61% of his matches (20-13). 6-2 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Basavareddy has a composed17-8 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Calabasas.
Basavareddy has an overall 6-2 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Basavareddy has never competed in this tournament before.
Christian Langmo
17 - 15win/loss
484
333
WWLWLWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-17 | 18-12 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 510, Langmo got to the 2nd round after defeating Pranav Kumar 6-74 6-4 6-3, Quinn Vandecasteele 3-6 7-5 6-4 and Ramkumar Ramanathan 7-5 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Ramanathan (7-5 6-2). During the match Langmo scored 82 points vs Ramanathan’s 65. The American was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Langmo bagged 17 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Christian Langmo conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 7 break points. Furthermore, Langmo put 59% of his first serves in, winning 79% (34/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (15/30) on the 2nd serve. Christian broke Ramanathan 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Christian has a composed 17-14 win-loss record in 2024, 12-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Basavareddy | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 83 |
| Pts | 73-60 | 283-247 |
| Total Points | 133 | 530 |
| Winners | 21 | 100 |
| %Winners | 29% | 35% |
Basavareddy played 1 match while Langmo competed in 3 matches. Langmo started his run from the qualifications while Basavareddy had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Christian Langmo lost 2 sets while Nishesh Basavareddy hasn’t lost a set so far. Basavareddy has played 6 set(s) less than Langmo (2 vs 8). Therefore, Basavareddy played 61 games less than Langmo. The American scored 21 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Christian scored 100 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Basavareddy | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 28 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 9.3 |
| 1st in | 26/61 | 140/257 |
| %1st in | 43% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 100/140 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 25/35 | 63/117 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 54% |
Basavareddy fired 5 aces . Langmo blasted 28 aces (9.3 per match). Basavareddy won 81% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Basavareddy | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 15 |
| Converted | 2/6 | 15/33 |
| % Converted | 33% | 45% |
| Conceded | 3 | 19 |
| Saved | 3 | 11 |
| % Saved | 100% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
Nishesh broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. The American very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 3 break points. Christian broke his opponents 15 times with a 45% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Basavareddy | |||
| R1 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-60 | 73-60 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 26/61 | 26/61 | |
| % 1st in | 43% | 43% | |
| 1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Langmo | |||||
| Q1 Kumar |
Q3 Vandecasteele |
R1 Ramanathan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-4 6-3 | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 31 | 20 | 83 | |
| pts | 102-86 | 99-96 | 82-65 | 283-247 | |
| Total points | 188 | 195 | 147 | 530 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | 34 | 100 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 33% | 41% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 0 | 17 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 6 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 51/96 | 43/73 | 140/257 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 53% | 59% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/51 | 34/43 | 100/140 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 65% | 79% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/42 | 25/45 | 15/30 | 63/117 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 56% | 50% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 5 | 3 | 15 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 5/10 | 3/10 | 15/33 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 50% | 30% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 8 | 7 | 19 | |
| Saved | 0/4 | 4/8 | 7/7 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 50% | 100% | 150% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWL
WWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Aidan MayoMayo (7-67 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Brandon HoltHolt – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-4 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
