Seong Chan Hong and Brandon Holt will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Holt is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Holt -> 1.72
Seong Chan Hong -> 2.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Seong Chan Hong vs. Brandon Holt
This will be the 2nd time that Seong Chan Hong and Brandon Holt square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Holt (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Holt won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger back in January 2024.
Seong Chan Hong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-26 | 21-20 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-27 | 14-12 | 10-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 4-7 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-15 | 9-7 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-8 | 8-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 191, Chan Hong reached the 2nd round after beating Murphy Cassone 6-4 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Seong defeated Cassone (6-4 3-6 6-2). During the match, Chan Hong scored 92 points vs Cassone’s 90. Seong was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Chan Hong recorded 6 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Seong Chan Hong lost the serve 5 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Chan Hong put 45% of his first serves in, winning 74% (29/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 36% (17/47) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Cassone 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Chan Hong has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (243-143). 25-12 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Chan Hong has an overall 212-105 record in the last years on hard.
Seong’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger,the Bengaluru Challenger and the Busan Challenger.
The Korean has an overall 25-15 win-loss record in 2024, 25-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Seong has never competed in this tournament before.
Brandon Holt
24 - 13win/loss
200
180
LWLWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-31 | 37-24 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 299, Holt got to the 2nd round after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-0 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, Holt defeated Kumar Mukund (6-0 3-6 6-2). During the match Holt scored 90 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 70. The American was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Holt recorded 6 aces and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Brandon Holt lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 63% of his first serves in, winning 73% (29/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (11/24) on the 2nd serve. Brandon broke Kumar Mukund 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
The American’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger and M25 Bakersfield.
Brandon has a composed 23-13 win-loss record in 2024, 22-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chan Hong | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 23 |
| Pts | 92-90 | 90-70 |
| Total Points | 182 | 160 |
| Winners | 29 | 29 |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% |
Both Chan Hong and Holt played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Seong Chan Hong conceded 1 set, while Brandon Holt lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Chan Hong and Holt have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Chan Hong played 4 games more than Holt. Seong scored 29 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 29 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chan Hong | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 6 |
| 1st in | 39/86 | 40/64 |
| %1st in | 45% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/40 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 17/47 | 11/24 |
| %2nd pts | 36% | 46% |
Chan Hong managed to score 6 aces . Holt bagged 6 aces . Chan Hong won 74% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 36% of the points. On the other side, Holt won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chan Hong | Holt |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 7 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 54% | 54% |
| Conceded | 7 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 29% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 3 |
Seong broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Seong surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 29% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Brandon conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chan Hong | |||
| R1 Cassone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 92-90 | 92-90 | |
| Total points | 182 | 182 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 39/86 | 39/86 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 45% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/47 | 17/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 36% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Holt | |||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 90-70 | 90-70 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 40/64 | 40/64 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/40 | 29/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/24 | 11/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Bernard TomicTomic – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Blaise BicknellBicknell (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Rudy QuanQuan – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Keegan SmithSmith (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Cooper WilliamsWilliams – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Ethan QuinnQuinn (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-0 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (3-0) – H2H and prediction
