Mitchell Krueger and Aidan Mayo will square off in the 2nd round of the Little Rock Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mitchell Krueger who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mitchell Krueger is the pick to win this match.
Mitchell Krueger -> 1.42
Aidan Mayo -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mitchell Krueger vs. Aidan Mayo
This will be the 2nd time that Mitchell Krueger and Aidan Mayo square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Krueger (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Krueger won 6-4 6-0 in the final in M25 Dallas back in 2023.
Mitchell Krueger
22 - 14win/loss
190
135
LWWLWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 18-7 | 9-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-29 | 15-19 | 4-4 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-28 | 18-15 | 6-5 | 1-6 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-24 | 19-12 | 5-5 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-13 | 14-8 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 251, Krueger reached the 2nd round after defeating Liam Draxl 6-3 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Krueger defeated Draxl (6-3 3-6 6-4). During the match, Krueger scored 98 points vs Draxl’s 92. Krueger was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Regarding the service games, Krueger bagged 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mitchell Krueger lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 59% of his first serves in, winning 77% (41/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. Mitchell broke Draxl 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Krueger has positive record in the last 10 years having won 51% of his matches (282-271). 11-5 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Krueger has an aggregate 194-163 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Indian Wells 1 Challenger where he defeated Brandon Holt in the final 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Mitchell has an aggregate 21-14 win-loss record in 2024, 11-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Aidan Mayo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-16 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-28 | 24-15 | 2-5 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-25 | 27-19 | 4-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 9-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 285, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Nick Chappell 6-3 5-7 7-64.
In the 1st round, Aidan defeated Chappell (6-3 5-7 7-64). During the match Mayo scored 115 points vs Chappell’s 99. Mayo was pretty aggressive to blast 49 winners.
About the serving games, Mayo scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Aidan Mayo was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (49/68) of his 1st serve and 58% (25/43) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Aidan broke Chappell 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Mayo has a compiled 7-14 win-loss record in 2024, 3-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Krueger | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 34 |
| Pts | 98-92 | 115-99 |
| Total Points | 190 | 214 |
| Winners | 41 | 49 |
| %Winners | 42% | 43% |
Both Krueger and Mayo played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Mitchell Krueger conceded 1 set, while Aidan Mayo conceded 1 set. Talking about their workload, Krueger and Mayo have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Krueger played 6 games less than Mayo. Krueger scored 41 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Mayo recorded 49 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Krueger | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1 |
| 1st in | 53/90 | 68/111 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 49/68 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 25/43 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 58% |
Krueger recorded 8 aces . Mayo recorded 1 ace . Krueger won 77% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Mayo won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Krueger | Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 29% | 40% |
| Conceded | 9 | 8 |
| Saved | 6 | 4 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Krueger broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Krueger surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Krueger | |||
| R1 Draxl |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 98-92 | 98-92 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 53/90 | 53/90 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 41/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 16/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mayo | |||
| R1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 5-7 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 115-99 | 115-99 | |
| Total points | 214 | 214 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 68/111 | 68/111 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 49/68 | 49/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/43 | 25/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWWW
LLWLWLLWLW Tennis Scores in Little Rock Challenger
- Bernard TomicTomic – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Trevor SvajdaSvajda – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Blaise BicknellBicknell (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Rudy QuanQuan – Stefan KozlovKozlov (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Andres MartinMartin – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (7-61 6-2) – See score progression
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Murphy CassoneCassone (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Keegan SmithSmith (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Cooper WilliamsWilliams – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (6-4 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Andres AndradeAndrade – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Nick ChappellChappell (6-3 5-7 7-64) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Ethan QuinnQuinn (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-0 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Tung-Lin WuWu (3-0) – H2H and prediction
