Christian Langmo and Quinn Vandecasteele will face off in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Christian Langmo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Christian Langmo is the pick to win this match.
Christian Langmo -> 1.444
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christian Langmo vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between Christian Langmo and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Christian Langmo
16 - 14win/loss
488
333
LWLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-17 | 16-12 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 509, Christian got to the qualifications after beating Pranav Kumar 6-74 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Kumar, Christian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-4 6-3). During the match, Langmo scored 102 points vs Kumar’s 86. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Langmo fired 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Christian Langmo was quite effective on serve to win 72% (33/46) of his 1st serve and 55% (23/42) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Langmo broke Kumar 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
Langmo has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (195-145). 10-9 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Langmo has a composed161-111 record in the last 8 years on hard.
Christian has a compiled 15-14 win-loss record in 2024, 10-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Quinn Vandecasteele
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 7-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 565, Quinn reached the qualifications after defeating Alex Lawson 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Vandecasteele had a good straight sets win against Lawson (6-0 6-1). During the match Vandecasteele scored 55 points vs Lawson’s 25. Vandecasteele was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Vandecasteele managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Quinn Vandecasteele was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 84% (21/25) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Vandecasteele broke Lawson 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Vandecasteele has a composed 5-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Quinn has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Langmo | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 13 |
| Pts | 102-86 | 55-25 |
| Total Points | 188 | 80 |
| Winners | 33 | 21 |
| %Winners | 32% | 38% |
Both Langmo and Vandecasteele played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Christian Langmo conceded 1 set while Quinn Vandecasteele hasn’t lost a set so far. Langmo has played 1 set more than Vandecasteele (3 vs 2). Therefore, Langmo played 19 games more than Vandecasteele. Langmo scored 33 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Quinn struck 21 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Langmo | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 7 |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 25/44 |
| %1st in | 52% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 21/25 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 23/42 | 10/19 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 53% |
Langmo scored 11 aces . Vandecasteele struck 7 aces . Langmo won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Langmo | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 5/6 |
| % Converted | 54% | 83% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
Langmo broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Christian conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Vandecasteele was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Kumar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 102-86 | 102-86 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 46/88 | 46/88 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/42 | 23/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/4 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||
| Q1 Lawson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 55-25 | 55-25 | |
| Total points | 80 | 80 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 25/44 | 25/44 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/25 | 21/25 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/19 | 10/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLWWW
LWLWLWLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Axel NefveNefve – Keegan SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
