![Prediction And Head To Head Keegan Smith Vs. Axel Nefve Soxzfmwk5w Prediction and head to head Keegan Smith vs. Axel Nefve](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Keegan-Smith-vs.-Axel-Nefve-SoXZfmWk5W.jpg)
Keegan Smith and Axel Nefve will square off in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Keegan Smith who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Keegan Smith is the pick to win this match.
Keegan Smith -> 1.61
Axel Nefve -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Keegan Smith vs. Axel Nefve
This will be the 2nd time that Keegan Smith and Axel Nefve play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Smith (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Smith won 6-3 6-2 in the 2nd round in M15 Albuquerque back in 2023.
Keegan Smith
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Keegan Smith](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/players_nophoto.gif)
14 - 10win/loss
592
339
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-13 | 17-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 35-26 | 31-20 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 30-24 | 26-14 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 16-5 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 592, Smith reached the qualifications after beating Andres Urrea 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, Keegan had a good straight sets win against Urrea (7-5 6-0). During the match, Smith scored 66 points vs Urrea’s 40. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Smith blasted 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Keegan Smith was pretty efficient on serve to win 77% (30/39) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Keegan was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Urrea 4 times.
Smith has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (145-92). 13-8 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Smith has an overall124-68 record in the last 9 years on hard.
The American has an aggregate 13-10 win-loss record in 2024, 13-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Axel Nefve
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 19-16 | 8-8 | 10-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 19-13 | 15-9 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 7-7 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 769 (career-high), Nefve reached the qualifications after defeating Strong Kirchheimer 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Kirchheimer (6-4 7-63). During the match Nefve scored 73 points vs Kirchheimer’s 60. Axel was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Nefve recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Axel Nefve was quite effective on serve to win 84% (32/38) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kirchheimer twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Wesley Chapel.
Nefve has an overall 18-12 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Smith | Nefve |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 23 |
Pts | 66-40 | 73-60 |
Total Points | 106 | 133 |
Winners | 30 | 32 |
%Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Smith and Nefve played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Smith and Nefve have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Smith played 5 games less than Nefve. Keegan scored 30 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American managed to score 32 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Smith | Nefve |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 4 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
1st in | 39/55 | 38/64 |
%1st in | 71% | 59% |
1st pts | 30/39 | 32/38 |
%1st pts | 77% | 84% |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 17/26 |
%2nd pts | 56% | 65% |
Smith made 5 aces . Nefve blasted 4 aces . Smith won 77% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Nefve won 84% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Smith | Nefve |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 2 |
Converted | 4/4 | 2/6 |
% Converted | 100% | 33% |
Conceded | 0 | 4 |
Saved | 0 | 3 |
% Saved | 0% | 75% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Keegan was rock solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Axel conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Smith | |||
Q1 Urrea |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 66-40 | 66-40 | |
Total points | 106 | 106 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 39/55 | 39/55 | |
% 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
1st pts | 30/39 | 30/39 | |
% 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Nefve | |||
Q1 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 73-60 | 73-60 | |
Total points | 133 | 133 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 38/64 | 38/64 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 32/38 | 32/38 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Axel NefveNefve – Keegan SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction