Rudy Quan and Filip Peliwo will face off in the qualifications of the Little Rock Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on STADIUM. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Filip Peliwo who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Filip Peliwo is the pick to win this match.
Filip Peliwo -> 1.44
Rudy Quan -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Rudy Quan vs. Filip Peliwo
There is no head to head record between Rudy Quan and Filip Peliwo since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Rudy Quan
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-10 | 12-5 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 13-11 | 13-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Rudy reached the qualifications after defeating Shintaro Imai 4-6 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications against Imai, Rudy recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Quan scored 101 points vs Imai’s 93. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Quan was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Rudy Quan lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Quan put 72% of his first serves in, winning 65% (36/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Rudy broke Imai 6 times after converting 32% of his break points (6/19).
Quan has a winning match record in the last 2 years having won 59% of his matches (23-16). 4-1 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Quan has a composed17-11 win-loss record in the last 2 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Orange Park.
The American has an aggregate 10-5 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Filip Peliwo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-29 | 26-20 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2023 | 40-37 | 35-25 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-31 | 40-21 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 31-20 | 14-10 | 9-8 | 8-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 468, Peliwo got to the qualifications after beating Tennyson Whiting 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Peliwo had a good straight sets win against Whiting (6-4 6-2). During the match Peliwo scored 74 points vs Whiting’s 61. The Canadian was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Peliwo couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 7 double faults. Filip Peliwo lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Peliwo put 56% of his first serves in, winning 74% (26/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (10/27) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Whiting 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Filip has a compiled 12-10 win-loss record in 2024, 8-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Quan | Peliwo |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 28 | 18 |
Pts | 101-93 | 74-61 |
Total Points | 194 | 135 |
Winners | 36 | 26 |
%Winners | 36% | 35% |
Both Quan and Peliwo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Rudy Quan conceded 1 set while Filip Peliwo hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Quan has played 1 set more than Peliwo (3 vs 2). Therefore, Quan played 10 games more than Peliwo. Rudy scored 36 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Filip scored 26 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Quan | Peliwo |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 0 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
1st in | 55/76 | 35/62 |
%1st in | 72% | 56% |
1st pts | 36/55 | 26/35 |
%1st pts | 65% | 74% |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/27 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 37% |
Quan didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Peliwo also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Quan won 65% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Peliwo won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 37% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Quan | Peliwo |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/19 | 5/6 |
% Converted | 32% | 83% |
Conceded | 6 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 33% | 67% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Rudy broke his opponent 6 times with a 32% conversion rate. Rudy surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Filip broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. The Canadian conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Quan | |||
Q1 Imai |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
pts | 101-93 | 101-93 | |
Total points | 194 | 194 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 55/76 | 55/76 | |
% 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
1st pts | 36/55 | 36/55 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/19 | 6/19 | |
Converted % | 32% | 32% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Peliwo | |||
Q1 Whiting |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 74-61 | 74-61 | |
Total points | 135 | 135 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 35/62 | 35/62 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 26/35 | 26/35 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 10/27 | 10/27 | |
% 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Moerani BouzigeBouzige (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Adam NeffNeff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Nicolas MejiaMejia (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andres AndradeAndrade – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Axel NefveNefve – Keegan SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction