Giovanni Fonio and Gerard Campana Lee will square off in the 2nd round of the Skopje Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 8. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Giovanni Fonio who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Giovanni Fonio is the pick to win this match.
Giovanni Fonio -> 1.61
Gerard Campana Lee -> 2.22
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giovanni Fonio vs. Gerard Campana Lee
There is no head to head record between Giovanni Fonio and Gerard Campana Lee since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Giovanni Fonio
18 - 15win/loss
288
269
LLWWWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-31 | 9-7 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-39 | 22-12 | 28-26 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-29 | 0-0 | 40-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 40-20 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-7 | 8-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 302, the Italian reached the 2nd round after beating Ryan Nijboer 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Giovanni had a good straight sets win against Nijboer (6-2 6-1). During the match, Fonio scored 52 points vs Nijboer’s 24. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fonio blasted 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Giovanni Fonio was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (18/22) of his 1st serve and 83% (15/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Fonio broke Nijboer 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Fonio has a winning win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 59% of his matches (284-199). 9-8 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fonio has an aggregate210-149 win-loss record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Italian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger and M25 Reggio Emilia.
The Italian has a composed 18-15 win-loss record in 2024, 9-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Gerard Campana Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-29 | 0-0 | 30-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 1-3 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 349 (career-high), Gerard reached the 2nd round after beating Jay Clarke 6-1 6-74 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Korean defeated Clarke (6-1 6-74 6-3). During the match Campana scored 93 points vs Clarke’s 77. Gerard was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Campana wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Gerard Campana Lee was very effective on serve to win 78% (43/55) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Korean broke Clarke 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Gerard has a composed 11-13 win-loss record in 2024, 11-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fonio | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 29 |
| Pts | 52-24 | 93-77 |
| Total Points | 76 | 170 |
| Winners | 18 | 43 |
| %Winners | 35% | 46% |
Both Fonio and Campana played 1 match. At the moment, Gerard Campana Lee lost 1 set while Giovanni Fonio hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Fonio has played 1 set(s) less than Campana (2 vs 3). Therefore, Fonio played 14 games less than Campana. Fonio scored 18 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean bagged 43 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fonio | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 22/40 | 55/86 |
| %1st in | 55% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 43/55 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 18/31 |
| %2nd pts | 83% | 58% |
Fonio blasted 3 aces . Campana didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Fonio won 82% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 83% of the points. On the other side, Campana won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fonio | Campana |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 80% | 44% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Fonio broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Italian extremely effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Korean broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Campana conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fonio | |||
| R1 Nijboer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 52-24 | 52-24 | |
| Total points | 76 | 76 | |
| Winners | 18 | 18 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/22 | 18/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/18 | 15/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 83% | 83% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Campana | |||
| R1 Clarke |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-74 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 93-77 | 93-77 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 55/86 | 55/86 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 43/55 | 43/55 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWLWW
WWLWLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Skopje Challenger
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Sergey FominFomin (5-7 7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Federico CinaCina (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Orlando LuzLuz (6-75 7-69 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-1 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Alexis GautierGautier (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-6(7) 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
