![Prediction And Head To Head Matej Dodig Vs. Ryan Seggerman 0wf98ng2v9 Prediction and head to head Matej Dodig vs. Ryan Seggerman](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Matej-Dodig-vs.-Ryan-Seggerman-0wF98NG2v9.jpg)
Matej Dodig and Ryan Seggerman will play each other in the 2nd round of the Skopje Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:30 am on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matej Dodig who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matej Dodig is the pick to win this match.
Matej Dodig -> 1.21
Ryan Seggerman -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matej Dodig vs. Ryan Seggerman
There is no head to head record between Matej Dodig and Ryan Seggerman since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Matej Dodig
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-12 | 12-2 | 21-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-16 | 1-2 | 38-12 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 367 (career-high), Matej reached the 2nd round after defeating Alexis Gautier 7-5 3-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Croatian defeated Gautier (7-5 3-6 6-4).During the match, Dodig scored less points (3) than Gautier. In fact, the world no. 367 won 93 points vs Gautier’s. That means that Dodig was more focused during the important points. The Croatian was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Dodig scored 5 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Matej Dodig lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Dodig put 50% of his first serves in, winning 73% (37/51) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (24/52) on the 2nd serve. Matej broke Gautier 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Dodig has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 75% of his matches (69-23). 14-5 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Dodig has a compiled52-17 match record in the last 2 years on clay.
Dodig’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M15 Rovinj.
Matej has a composed 26-7 win-loss record in 2024, 14-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Skopje Challenger
Matej has never competed in this tournament before.
Ryan Seggerman
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 13-10 | 6-4 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 29-13 | 25-11 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 555, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Calum Puttergill 7-5 6-0, Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine 7-5 6-4 and Dimitar Kuzmanov 1-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Kuzmanov, Seggerman had a free pass after Kuzmanov retired on a 1-0 . scoreline.
The American has an overall 8-6 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Dodig | Seggerman |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
Tot Games | 31 | 41 |
Pts | 93-96 | 138-100 |
Total Points | 189 | 238 |
Winners | 37 | 59 |
%Winners | 40% | 43% |
Dodig played 1 match while Seggerman competed in 3 matches. Seggerman started his run from the qualifications while Dodig had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Matej Dodig surrendered 1 set while Ryan Seggerman hasn’t lost a set so far. Dodig has played 3 set(s) less than Seggerman (3 vs 6). Therefore, Dodig played 10 games less than Seggerman. Dodig scored 37 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The American made 59 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Dodig | Seggerman |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 26 |
Avg per match | 5 | 8.7 |
1st in | 51/103 | 75/113 |
%1st in | 50% | 66% |
1st pts | 37/51 | 59/75 |
%1st pts | 73% | 79% |
2nd pts | 24/52 | 23/38 |
%2nd pts | 46% | 61% |
Dodig bagged 5 aces . Seggerman recorded 26 aces (8.7 per match). Dodig won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Seggerman won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Dodig | Seggerman |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 8 |
Converted | 4/11 | 8/15 |
% Converted | 36% | 53% |
Conceded | 8 | 5 |
Saved | 4 | 3 |
% Saved | 50% | 60% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
The Croatian broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Dodig dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Seggerman broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. Ryan conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
Dodig | |||
R1 Gautier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 93-96 | 93-96 | |
Total points | 189 | 189 | |
Winners | 37 | 37 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 9 | 9 | |
1st in | 51/103 | 51/103 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
1st pts | 37/51 | 37/51 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 24/52 | 24/52 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
Saved | 4/8 | 4 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Seggerman | |||||
Q1 Puttergill |
Q3 Bittoun |
R1 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-0 | 7-5 6-4 | 1-0 ret. | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 22 | 1 | 41 | |
pts | 60-36 | 74-63 | 4-1 | 138-100 | |
Total points | 96 | 137 | 5 | 238 | |
Winners | 22 | 34 | 3 | 59 | |
%Winners | 37% | 46% | 75% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 10 | 16 | 0 | 26 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | |
1st in | 28/44 | 43/64 | 4/5 | 75/113 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 67% | 80% | 66% | |
1st pts | 22/28 | 34/43 | 3/4 | 59/75 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 79% | 75% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 12/16 | 10/21 | 1/1 | 23/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 75% | 48% | 100% | 61% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 3/7 | 0/0 | 8/15 | |
Converted % | 63% | 43% | 0% | 53% | |
Conceded | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 3 | |
Saved % | 0% | 75% | – | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Skopje Challenger
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexandar LazarovLazarov (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Joel SchwaerzlerSchwaerzler – Sergey FominFomin (5-7 7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – Bor ArtnakArtnak (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Ryan NijboerNijboer (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-67 6-1) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Federico CinaCina (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Maks KasnikowskiKasnikowski – Orlando LuzLuz (6-75 7-69 4-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee – Jay ClarkeClarke (6-1 6-74 6-3) – See score progression
- Matej DodigDodig – Alexis GautierGautier (7-5 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Gauthier OnclinOnclin (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexander WeisWeis – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Samuel Vincent RuggeriVincent Ruggeri (7-6(7) 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Jiri VeselyVesely (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Luka MikrutMikrut (6-4 7-6(8)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mirza BasicBasic – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Neil OberleitnerOberleitner – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan SeggermanSeggerman – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction